Yesterday morning saw the subject of Islamophobia aired on Samira
Ahmed’s Sunday Morning Live, with Ann
Leslie on duty to excuse the behaviour of the tabloid press in general, and the
Daily Mail in particular, over its
routinely slanted coverage of anything concerning Muslims. Leslie was even made to look moderate by the occasional hearing
given to a representative of the BNP.
Yet she was not put on the spot over the very obviously
selective reporting whenever Islam is concerned: the Heywood grooming case is
one such. While there was much punditry devoted to emphasising the line that
Muslim males were going after white girls, little
space was given to the report that showed the ringleader to be going after any young women, after he was convicted
of raping an Asian girl.
We saw the selective
reportage reprised last week, when six people arrested on suspicion of
offences under terrorism law were widely reported, and merely by coincidence
they happened to be Muslims. But there was little reporting, and no punditry,
devoted to the six terrorism charges made against Niall Florence from Rochdale,
who is not a Muslim.
Added to all of this today are two posts, one from Fiyaz
Mughal at Liberal Conspiracy, and
one at Comment
Is Free by Mehdi Hasan, who has
been the subject of a welter of abuse in the recent past, which mostly includes
commenters quoting selected extracts from his previous writings back at him
while telling him that they mean whatever the commenter has decided they mean.
That is, of course, when Hasan is not getting yet less
reasoned abuse and threats. Both posts have garnered replies along the lines of
“but what about Islamic countries”, “but Islam is intolerant (or similar)”
and of course “what about the cartoonists”.
None of these addresses the scale or nature of the abuse to which Hasan, and
Muslims more generally, are routinely subjected.
And this is disturbing. It’s not good enough to excuse
intolerance by suggesting that “it’s OK
because they do something worse in their countries”. There are all manner
of atrocities carried out in the name of Christianity. There have been many
more carried out in the name of ideologies that have no religious connection.
None of this behaviour should be allowed to deflect attention from what happens
here.
In the UK, and indeed in any part of the free world,
peaceable debate and the ability to enjoy freedom of speech should not be
conditional on a person’s religious or political beliefs. Nor should those
beliefs be used as an excuse to indulge in hate speech, threats, bullying and
intimidation. Mehdi Hasan, and any other follower of The Prophet, must be
allowed to say and write as they think fit.
So when he asks “who’s
with me”, well, I am. So there.
No comments:
Post a Comment