Hot on the heels of yesterday evening’s Channel 4 Dispatches about Ryanair, the
Millwall of air carriers (everybody hates us and we don’t care), Michael O’Leary
and his merry men have apparently instructed lawyers and the company “looks
forward to this matter being resolved in the courts”. But many industry
watchers will be asking not about the programme’s content, but what was missed
out.
Channel 4 is warmly welcomed to Dublin
While Ryanair management will be rightly concerned about any adverse comment on the safety of their operations – safe operation, after all, is their business – there have been a number of well documented incidents in the recent past which have all been, shall we say, avoidable. The impression is given, in all these cases, that pressure to save and/or make up time has been a contributory factor.
The incident that Dispatches
did mention, a missed approach to Memmingen Airport in September last year,
bears further examination, and the
German safety authority has issued an Interim Report. The flight deck had
requested use not of the operational runway (06) but to land from the opposite
direction (24) to save time. Voice
transcripts suggest the pilot flying (PF) was not 100% sure of the procedure.
As the aircraft approached, its sink rate (the rate of
descent) was high, and there was a tailwind component of over 25 knots. The
plane’s altitude dropped to 460 feet above ground level at one point. Whether
or not this was totally safe I will not comment further, except to note that
subjecting passengers to a right bank angle of 25 degrees, followed by a left
bank angle of 35 degrees, is, er, unusual.
And not for the first time, the cockpit voice recording
(CVR) was not preserved. This was also the case when a
Ryanair flight landed at Alicante airport without contacting the tower and
receiving permission in January 2011. Also, in both cases, the co-pilot did not
have an Airline Transport Pilot’s Licence (ATPL). Last October, a Ryanair
flight took off from
Eindhoven airport without first getting clearance to do so.
There are plenty more of these incidents, even without the arguments
over fuel reserves that took up much of the Dispatches
programme. For instance, the
August 2008 coming together of a Ryanair Boeing 737 and a stationary
Lufthansa A320 at Manchester airport after the flight deck on the 737 thought
they had sufficient room to pass behind the A320, before finding out they didn’t.
And the late
2008 incident at Stansted, when another Ryanair 737 attempted a crossbleed engine
start while being pushed back by a tug (the driver of which had to abandon his
vehicle in order to prevent his being sucked into the powered-up engine) again
suggest time pressure – as well as showing the hours that some of the company’s
pilots are racking up.
I don’t dispute Ryanair’s 29-year safety record. I’d just like it to stay that way.
2 comments:
And don't forget the Stansted fire incident. Ignoring the small matter of the engine on fire (that could happen to anyone) it raised questions of pilots rushing, not communicating well and of cabin crew training.
http://www.aaib.gov.uk/cms_resources.cfm?file=/dft_avsafety_pdf_029538.pdf
I thought the program was lame. It made the start of allegations, didn't nail them down hard enough and then allowed Ryanair to make vague responses that didn't really answer the question. It was almost like the Chronic-le had made the program!
Ireland is a remarkably thoughtful place, years ago they coined the word Gobshite so that they would be ready when O'Leary emerged.
Enjoy the blog, sir. Keep up the good work. I appreciate the effort that goes in to blogging on a regular basis!
A minor correction. As a supporter of the club referred to (for my sins of birth) the song is "No-one Likes Us, We Don't Care". A minor amendment, but significant enough for our identity.
Keep up the good work.
Post a Comment