What the f***'s this got to do with me, c***?!?!?
So it was that the Daily Mail, claiming an “exclusive” for its non-revelation, declared earlier this week “National Trust secretly makes all its scones vegan - while critics condemn 'woke' use of vegetable-based spread instead of butter”, once again deliberately misusing the word “woke”. There was no secret, but there was another attempt to associate “vegan” with “bad”.
Anyhoo, do go on. “They are the much-loved staple enjoyed with jam and cream at its tearooms across the country … But the National Trust is now risking the ire of diners after admitting its scones have gone vegan - and that they 'may taste different to the traditional version’”. Big intercoursing deal.
Sadly, there was more. “Critics have condemned the use of a vegetable-based spread instead of butter in the baking as a 'virtue-signalling betrayal', in what looks like yet another woke row involving the charity”. A row about people being “alert to injustice within society, especially racism”? What does that have to do with scones? It doesn’t. But the Mail was not finished. Yet.
“Campaign group Restore Trust, which wants to rid the charity of its 'divisive ideologies' and 'activism', slammed the move … Chairman Cornelia van der Poll said: 'It is unfortunate that the National Trust can't even get scones right, let alone bigger issues such as properly looking after the properties in its care.’”. Restore Trust, having lost twice as NT members saw them coming, inventing “ideology” the Trust doesn’t have, and “activism” it doesn’t do.
(c) Kate Whitaker
What it has not told is that there is no secret, and that the Mail has been caught trying to play both sides of the field (again). Celia Richardson, the NT’s communications director, responded to the “secret” dishonesty by reminding us “National Trust scones have been made without butter for many years and we publish all our recipes”. More crap Mail propaganda, then.
And it got worse as she told yesterday “Stand by for the National Trust's Coleen Rooney moment. It's a Wagatha Christie-style discovery, but for scones, and it's big”. Big, y’know, big. BIG! And, just to really upset the Mail, she pronounces it “s-con” - not “s-cone”. So what’s the reveal?
“Yesterday the Daily Mail claimed [the National Trust] has 'secretly' stopped using butter in its scones in a 'virtue-signalling betrayal' of heritage. It now transpires the very same Daily Mail glowingly published our scone recipe in 2018 MADE WITH MARGARINE!!!” Under the headline “National pleasure: Fruit scones”, the Mail had gushed “Celebrate the great British tradition of afternoon tea by serving up some of the truly scrumptious recipes from a new book by the National Trust”. Could it get worse for the Dacre doggies?
It certainly could. “National Trust tearooms around the country are proud of their scones. Serve simply with good strawberry jam and generous spoonfuls of clotted cream for the perfect afternoon tea”. And there was the recipe. No butter. But 115 grams of soft margarine. Gushed over by the Mail.
No secrets, and bang to rights again. The inmates of the Northcliffe House bunker are full of crap. But you knew that already.
https://www.patreon.com/Timfenton
12 comments:
Jesus wept.
Fucking tea and fucking scones.
The dregs of the Rothermere Heil, Der Telegraaf and the Murdoch Scum, while their paymasters promote mass slaughter and thievery across the world.
Isn't it more the case that margarine is cheaper than butter?
I do wonder how many people would benefit from reduced blood pressure if they stopped allowing themselves to be kept in a state of perpetual anger by this silly publication.
12:47.
Where a far right racist rag is concerned perpetual anger is preferable to perpetual apathy.
Perpetual apathy was tried with Der Stürmer and Völkischer Beobachter. It didn't work out well. The apathy quickly turned into compliance.
12:47.
There was this, too:
https://www.timesofisrael.com/how-britains-nazi-loving-press-baron-made-the-case-for-hitler/
I think a national trust associated cook or Baker should go undercover at the Mail, if they have a cafeteria and discreetly introduce vegan scones and see if persons can tell the difference.
First world problems, first world problems..
The important question remains unanswered, though, viz. does eating National Trust scones:
• Cure cancer, or
• Cause cancer, or
• Give your house price cancer
?
It very much appears that the scientists at the Daily Fail Oncology Project are slacking. Probably because they’ve got wokeosis.
Glad to learn my dairy intolerance makes me woke...
Also, given the price of butter these days of cost of living crisis, saving money to preserve profits is also woke apparently.
Why the National Trust? What is it about an organisation protecting large amounts of real estate from property developers that gets their backs up?
Oh! I didn't think about this one!!! Of course, it makes *perfect* sense!
I thought their obsession with NT was more sophisticated... like if we're made aware great fortunes of the past were made on the back of slavery, that we might click on the fact great fortunes of today come from exploitation... Or that it would debunk the idea of meritocracy...
But the fact NT sits of valuable land they'd love to "develop" makes way more sense!
Ben, why not both?
Apparently McDonald's burger buns are made with a butter substitute, and they even describe them as vegan, but I haven't heard anyone call McDonald's woke. What the point of vegan burger buns is, though, totally escapes me!
Post a Comment