Small wonder that our free and fearless press continues to demand that its readers keep looking over there: last night’s Coronation concert is today’s front page lead for most of them, with the Prince of Wales widely quoted telling Brian “Pa, we are all so proud of you”, and “Granny would be proud”, while not mentioning The Firm’s treatment of his own late mother.
It is partly for that reason that those same papers churn out an incessant tide of knocking copy, almost all of it bad faith, bottom feeding yellow journalism, aimed at Will’s brother, the Duke of Sussex, and wife Meghan. Haz has rocked the boat, has never forgotten Diana, and never will. He is in the process of suing the arse off the Mail and Sun. Hence the hostile copy.
But the feel good factor brought on by the Coronation is about to prove no more than fleeting. Those pundits using the Royals to tell others what they should be doing, how they should act, and in what manner they should deport themselves are, equally, about to realise the limits of their authority. Britons will realise there are haves and have nots. And that most are have nots.
They will begin to look around their corner of King Charles’ realm, seeing the cracked pavements, the littered parks and greens, the boarded-up shops, the closed banks, the empty town centres of an evening, the increasingly deserted bus stations, the closed pubs, cafés and restaurants, and the long trudge or obligatory drive to the supermarket, and realise they’ve been had.
Thus will the fawning, grovelling and faithful experience the end of euphoria and the return of reality. They were told things would improve, especially with the departure of the UK from the European Union. The reverse is proving true: Brexit has brought soaring costs, especially of food and drink, while the rest of the EU continues to do better than us. We were conned.
Increasingly authoritarian laws, exemplified by “conspiracy to cause a public nuisance”, which brings us ever closer to “looking at me in a funny way”, and its implementation on the streets of London last weekend with the lifting of peaceful protesters and even a group of volunteers working with vulnerable people around Westminster, will ultimately provoke a backlash.
Here, too, the politicians are out of touch: not just the Tories who brought us this legal equivalent of state intolerance, but a Labour opposition that dare not say boo for fear of antagonising an equally intolerant press establishment. No erosion of human rights is too much for them: they therefore appear allied with the Tories. They think this will gain them power. They’re having a laugh.
Will this increasingly grim status quo endure? Only until someone, somewhere, charts a way out of the decline, cutting through the fog of media falsehood and misinformation, providing leadership rather than abject subservience to an establishment, too many of whom, especially in the media part of it, treat this as a kind of game. For the have nots, it is anything but.
Labour appears not to have taken on board Galbraith’s definition of leadership: “All of the great leaders have had one characteristic in common: it was the willingness to confront unequivocally the major anxiety of their people in their time. This, and not much else, is the essence of leadership”. Living standards. The NHS. A decent environment. And not authoritarianism.
Nor has the party taken on board Galbraith’s corollary: “A leader can compromise, get the best deal he can. Politics is the art of the possible. But he cannot be thought to evade”. Keir Starmer and his faithful lieutenants have been evading big time. Last week’s local election results were better for the Lib Dems, and especially the Greens, than The Red Team.
As the Coronation vanishes from view, so politicians must respond as the people rediscover reality. Who will lead? And if no-one will, what then?
https://www.patreon.com/Timfenton
8 comments:
Well, Tim, we know what is likely to happen next if there is no change to the political trajectory: sooner or later there will be serious social unrest....followed by an "appeal for a 'strong leader' ". This time not a uniformed führer, duce or caudillo, but a "compassionate conservative". Maybe even "a national government".
Meantime, unions and their elected leaders will be demonised, the most outspoken isolated. There will be no organised opposition worth the name. Parliament will degenerate even further as the one party state becomes yet more paranoid. After a time, cracks in the British Union will widen. Legalised institutional thievery will intensify. Even the Welfare State - created to save capitalism - will be threatened.
The present "coronation" is a comic opera charade designed to impress gullible mugs, of which we have too many. Its real purpose is to signal that the same old corrupt Oxbridge motley crew will be in charge.
Matters can and will get much worse. Which means a major "international incident/crisis" will be required. Again.
Urfascism is the future. Get used to it. It has been here since 1979 anyway.
The government continues to reinforce its Brexit lunacy.
Kemi Badenoch has just spent £4m of public money on a very expensive box of matches for a bonfire of retained EU legislation, whose only outcome will be to make our trade with our nearest neighbours even less possible than it is at present.
There was a lot of bullshit written between 2015 and 2019 by centrists commentators and hacks deciding they were "politically homeless" because hundreds of thousands of Labour members voted for a democratic socialist to be their leader...twice. I note with some amusement that a lot of the same commentariat are now bemoaning the current Labour policy of agreeing not to tinker with pretty much any existing authoritarian Tory policy. As the meme goes, they've tried nothing and now they're all out of ideas.
On the subject of political homelessness, I found myself in a voting booth last Thursday presented with a list of names and party affiliations which encompassed the entirety of acceptable political thought in this country, that is to say you can vote for anyone so long as they are to the right of the Liberal Democrats. For the first time in my life (and I'm in my 6th decade on this earth) I found myself writing NONE across the ballot paper.
with the lifting of peaceful protesters and even a group of volunteers working with vulnerable people around Westminster, will ultimately provoke a backlash.
I've yet to read of their release. Why not?
Meanwhile, in Crewe, St Barnabas....Labour vote down 36%, tories up by 24%... Lab loss/tory gain.
Shameful, Tim.😊
You can vote for a Neo-Liberal party, a Neo-Liberal party, or a Neo-Liberal party. The right is shifting the Overton window ever further. What is now "mainstream" policy was in the BNP manifesto two decades ago.
The grovelling will continue.
One look at Parliament and corporate media will tell you why. Both are bought-and-paid-for.
All the publicly available evidence indicates the mad greed and corruption will deepen.
This is how far this country is toward open fascism:
https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2023/05/freedom-of-speech-elbit-and-fascist-policing/
Post a Comment