Legatum, via its then economics director Shanker Singham, pushed for a hard Brexit. He had, as the Guardian noted at the time, “coordinated a letter written … to Theresa May demanding a hard Brexit”. Now Legatum is effectively paying a fair whack of Mr Thirsty’s fees for his GB News appearances. What is also notable about Chandler is that his Russia connection keeps being raised, and keeps not being convincingly denied.
Back in 2018, the Guardian article continued “Speaking in the Commons, the [Labour] MP Ben Bradshaw who has previously raised questions about the Kremlin’s possible role in Brexit said he called for an investigation into Legatum last November … he was concerned by … by the ‘growing corruption, money laundering and sale of passports by Malta, where Chandler has just acquired citizenship’”. And then came the news from Monaco.
“Neither Christopher Chandler nor anyone at Legatum is aware of any such alleged ‘investigation’ by the French authorities [they should voice their suspicions publicly?] … To be clear Christopher Chandler has never been approached at any time by the French or any other authorities regarding Russia [ditto]”. So why is this now so important?
One look at today’s Mail on Sunday tells you why. Farage, paid in part by Legatum’s backing, is the subject of a puff piece by the paper’s political editor Glen Owen, headlined “Farage’s new drive for vote to kill off Boris’s ‘ruinous’ green agenda”. Mr Thirsty spent years demanding a Brexit referendum. Now he’s demanding another one.
Christopher Chandler
Farage is calling his new campaign “Power not poverty”, fraudulently presenting the issue of green agenda meaning impoverishment for the less well off. He will have the support of all those Tories in the Net Zero Scrutiny Group, who make the same equivalence, despite the hike in energy bills being mainly down to their party’s own actions.
Does that make Steve Baker, Craig Mackinlay and their pals agents of a foreign power? No. It just makes them yet more useful idiots. As the Green Party’s Caroline Lucas has pointed out, “There is something deeply confused about the Baker-Mackinlay attack on green levies as a burden on poorer people, when those levies have played a significant part in keeping energy bills down”. Not that Farage will care. And there is more.
Farage’s campaign is utterly pointless. All that his push to abandon Green Levies would do would be to leave the UK exposed to the next spike in gas prices. And the next one. And the one after that. This is yet another campaign that, like Brexit, is about rich people gaslighting the less well off under the pretence that they are there to help them.
What we actually have here is what John le Carré’s fictional spymaster George Smiley would have called “an embarrassing chain of events”. Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin needs fossil fuel revenues to increase one day, Nigel Farage pops up in the Mail on Sunday advocating a policy that will do just that the next. An embarrassing chain of events.
And there in the middle is the thus far publicity-shy Christopher Chandler, whose firm Legatum pushed for a hard Brexit and got it, and is now backing GB News, where Farage is pushing his fraudulent Net Zero abandonment campaign. Along with useful idiots in the Tory Party, and the usual reactionary squad from our free and fearless press.
There will no doubt be the usual cries of “Russophobia” at the linking of another fraudulent campaign, that will ultimately impoverish the poorest, back to the gangsterist régime in Moscow. But that, right now, is where it gives every appearance of leading.
Of course, Legatum could divest itself of GB News. But then, GB News would not exist.
https://www.patreon.com/Timfenton
6 comments:
And during the "shortage" of energy supplies who benefits from "narrower markets? Cui bono?
Answers on a postcard via privatised spivmail to Texas Inc., c/o Jellied Eel House, Barrow Boy Avenue, Canary Wharf, Airstrip One.
A few more years of Tory government, and we will eventually have an economy emulating the Russia one- where an obscenely wealthy minority rule over a deeply impoverished majority.
Is fake news — work of moose and squirrel — to discredit Fearless Leader!
It is indeed true that "the poorest" will be "ultimately impoverished". That's the British way of life. It's what people vote for....as long as they aren't the victims of inflicted poverty.
But with a quarter of Britain already impoverished for decades who needs a bogeyman to make it worse. We already have plenty of home-grown politicians and oligarchs ready to inflict even more.
That said, it's always useful to have bogeymen on standby. You listening, Goldstein(s) and refugees?
"Cui bono?"
My bet's on the same country that profited from Europe's self destruction in two world wars. And then pissed its I'll gotten gains up the wall of history.
It's worth noting Nigel has a fellow traveller in Parliament - Steve Baker. Once of the ERG and the Covid Recovery Group and now of the Net Zero Scrutiny Group.
Post a Comment