A country within the EU and which has adopted the Euro doing
well? This discovery has
seriously taxed Dan, Dan The Oratory Man, who has looked at the Austrian
public sector’s 44% of GDP, the unemployment rate of less than 5%, and as a
result appears baffled. In the free market conventional wisdom, such figures
are by definition incompatible. And there’s worse to come.
Schönbrunn palace and gardens
Per capita income is the second highest in the Eurozone, with
only Luxembourg doing better. Hannan observes that his fellow libertarians are
uniformly predicting a breakdown – the usual reaction of such people to this
apparent heresy – and then sets out to understand why. And on most counts he is
well wide of the mark, except for his touching on Austria’s closeness to its
former Communist neighbours.
The closeness, especially to Hungary, is not merely one of
being the country next door: until 1918 they were part of the same empire.
Business continued despite the Iron Curtain: when Budapest’s Cogwheel Railway renewed
its fleet in the late 70s, the trains were built in Austria. Transport links
between the two countries remained good and were already improving when
Communism fell in Eastern Europe.
Hochstrahlbrunnen and Russian war memorial in Schwarzenbergplatz, Vienna
Hannan touches on the federal structure of Austria: this,
too, helps, with many powers, especially building and planning, entrusted to
federal parliaments. But one income source that he doesn’t mention is tourism,
and for Austria this is the second greatest source of national income after
manufacturing industry. The money rolls in all year round: winter sports, city
breaks, summer getaways and festivals all feature.
And the economy is mostly powered for free: more than half
Austria’s electricity comes from hydro power, and almost 63% of it in total
from renewables. The country’s neutrality means less than 1% of GDP is spent on
defence, with military deployments limited to UN peace-keeping and humanitarian
purposes, including national emergencies.
Big wheel in the Prater Park
But what has ensured Austria takes a pragmatic approach to
its economy more than any other factor is that, firstly, it effectively started
with a blank canvas in the 1950s after occupying Allied forces (including the
Russians) had left, and secondly, that all Hannan’s economist heroes had long
before left their homeland to preach what J K Galbraith called “the traditional irrelevancy” elsewhere.
So while the names of Hayek and von Mises are lauded at
get-togethers in Vienna, the real-world business of managing the economy goes
on, generally, without reference to them. Austria prospers not because of the Austrian School, but despite it. That’s something for Dan to
think about when he catches the publicly run U-Bahn out to Schönbrunn for a free walk round the publicly
maintained gardens.
But you won’t see
such heresy at Telegraph blogs any
time soon. What a surprise.
2 comments:
note the phrase "small state advantage" - sounds like he's ready to support Alex Salmond!
SteveB
You might have a point there. I read a few years ago one of the ASI claque point out the similarities between Slovakia (small, mountains, rivers, reputation for soldiering in the 18th century, flat tax) and Scotland (small, mountains, rivers, reputation for soldiering in the 18th century). The wish being that if only the Scots would adopt a flat tax they could become as wealthy and good natured as the Slovakians.
The other thought i had was that Hannan and co believe that all Austrians follow Austrian economics and so, all Scots must want to embrace a particular interpretation of Mr A Smith but are prevented from doing so by the Marxists holed up in Whitehall. But surely, no one could be that dim not even on the Telegraph blogs?
Post a Comment