Something rather curious appears to have happened over at
Northcliffe House, as a highly personal attack on the judiciary in the print
edition of the Daily Mail has somehow
been lost in the laundry en route to Mail
Online. Fortunately, a concerned reader has shared a screen shot of the
rant (see how that happens, Mr Dacre?) so we can see the clear intention of the
piece.
What's f***ing wrong with kicking a few girlies every so often, c***?!? Er, with the greatest of respect, Mr Jay
The
underlying story is that “A mother told
the High Court yesterday that ‘miracles do happen’ as she pleaded for the life
of her critically ill baby son. The
boy, who was left severely brain damaged after a traumatic premature birth by
Caesarean section, has spent his short life on a ventilator in an intensive
care unit”. An unnamed NHS Trust has applied for permission
to switch off the one year old’s life support.
In a routine Mail
false comparison, the Ashya King case was spuriously referenced: “In words that echoed those of the parents of
five-year-old cancer victim Ashya King, whose family fled the UK after
disagreements with the NHS over his treatment, the baby’s father said they had
been made to feel ‘our child is not our child any more’ by doctors who gave ‘no
consideration’ to their feelings”.
That is bad enough journalism, but the most blatant attack
on the entire process was directed personally at Ms Justice Alison Russell, who
had already been a recipient of the Mail’s
attention: “A senior judge has been
allowed to take a feminist title for the first time. Newly-appointed High Court judge Alison Russell will be known on the
bench as Ms Justice Russell, it was confirmed yesterday”
it reported last May.
Lost in the laundry: this highly personal attack did not make it to the online version of the article (shared by Katy Guest)
This was the starting point for today’s rant: “Ms Justice Alison Russell is an arch feminist
with a history of gagging the press ... the Judge ... who is unmarried and has no children, was appointed to the High
Court in January ... She immediately made headlines by asking to be referred to
by the title ‘Ms Justice’ rather than
the traditional Mrs or Miss”. The shame of it! And there was more.
The twist is that this attack appears to have been too much even for Mail Online.
No comments:
Post a Comment