The obedient hackery of the legendarily foul mouthed Paul
Dacre has a strange obsession with the Middleton family, and especially younger
daughter Pippa, to the extent that they are more than willing to play both
sides of the field at once: copy will describe her as “Her Royal Hotness”, while at the same time attacking the family for
appearing to be a little too, er, Royal.
Who're you f***ing calling obsessive, c***?!?
And the adoption by supermarket chain Waitrose of Pippa as
their replacement for the evergreen Delia Smith has sent Dacre and his attack
doggies into apoplexy, so much so that Claire Ellicott has been detailed to rubbish
a feature in the Waitrose magazine on the grounds of cost. Many readers will be
taken in by the apparently authoritative pricing. They should look a little
closer.
The secret of Pippa's smile ... Sparking wine!
“Pippa's
Provencal Picnic is intended as romantic meal for two ...Includes fig and
goat's cheese fougasse ... Also on the menu is peach and vanilla fizz made with
sparking [sic] wine ... The total cost of the menu is £60.02 for
two, or £30.01 per person” [my emphasis]. And, as the man said, there’s more: the graphic gets
the total up to a whopping £99.57, after bundling in the vino.
That’s one pricy picnic. But then the eye starts to scan
down the list of ingredients. Peach and Vanilla Fizz, for starters: you’d chuck
all the caster sugar into it? Eeurgh!
Of course you wouldn’t. And, as for the Fig and Goat’s Cheese Fougasse, you
definitely wouldn’t use a whole litre of olive oil, pack of sea salt or goat’s
cheese. Hell’s teeth, this is a recipe for two, after all.
You're going to use all of that?
It gets worse: the Smoked Chicken and Melon Salad won’t use
a whole chicken, or another whole litre of olive oil, and certainly not all the
contents of the clear honey and red wine vinegar. And as for putting a whole
cucumber in it, er, yeah, would you care to repeat that? The Strawberry and
Lavender Cheesecake Jars continues the theme (a whole pack of icing sugar and
pack of Philly ... yummy (not)).
Supermarket mags are full of idealised recipes. They serve
one main purpose, and that’s to give customers an idea of what they can cook up
from the kind of ingredients they may have to buy in, but equally may already
have in the food store or fridge. No-one is going to go out and buy every one
of those ingredients just to put together a summer picnic.
So what is the purpose of the Mail’s article, other than a crude hatchet job, which in any case
will do little more than generate free publicity for Waitrose and Ms Middleton?
In any case, Dacre’s attack doggies misjudge their target: your average
Waitrose customer is far readier to spend more on a special occasion. Why d’you
think they shop there in the first place?
It’s a strangely pointless obsession that the Mail has here. No change there, then.
1 comment:
Such a weird article for them to write. I don't know about you but I think we've all probably spent £60+ on ingredients for a nice meal for someone you're looking to impress. I would expect most Mail readers wouldn't really think it was hugely out of the ordinary (just maybe not an everyday occurence), especially considering you can drop £60 on a bottle of Waitrose wine.
Maybe the Mail are assuming their readers aren't well enough off to be able to afford a treat from time to time.
Post a Comment