The reports of someone
close to Young Dave calling Tory Party activists “swivel-eyed loons” were first carried by the Murdoch Times and Barclay Brothers’ Maily Telegraph. The corresponding
Sunday titles have continued to run the story. The Tories have since gone on
the offensive, suggesting a connection between the way that “Loongate” was building, and the Alistair
McAlpine saga.
So it should be pretty clear to anyone who is bothered that
it is the papers that are normally the Tories’ natural supporters which have
been majoring on this issue. From this, it follows that if the party wants to
get a grip of the problem, it needs to address these reports, and maybe take a
long and hard look at its relationships with journalists, as well as at its own
behaviour.
As I noted
yesterday, Andrew Feldman, who has spent most of the weekend flatly denying
that he was the one close to Cameron, has already been responsible for his fair
share of howlers. The impression is given that he became Tory co-chair – and a
life peer – not on merit, but partly because of his contacts book, and more
significantly because he is one of Cameron’s jolly good pals from University.
David Aaronovitch, who is prone to speaking direct common
sense on occasion, put it very well on The
Andy Marr Show (tm) this morning: there were three possible responses for
the Tories to take. One was to take it on the chin, the second was to ask why
anyone would think that of their activists, and the third – which is what they’re
doing – is to demand “who says our branch
chairs are loons”?
In other words, the Tories are instantly turning defensive.
What came after Aaronovitch had had his say on the Marr paper review was that
other prominent party members then appeared on the same show to add insult to
injury. Moreover, the same tactic was deployed – to demand that viewers “look over there”. And where they wanted
viewers to look was at the BBC.
John Redwood, the humourless Europhobe who is still MP for
Wokingham, and who failed in his attempt to dislodge “Shagger” Major in 1995, was first. The Tories were not split, he
asserted, and any suggestion in that direction was because the BBC wanted to
present it as such. The thought that he was in favour of exiting the EU (full
stop), and that many of his colleagues were not, was not allowed to enter.
Then came Jeremy Hunt, no longer the Culture Secretary to
the relief of Spoonerism sufferers throughout the media, to peddle exactly the
same line. The Tories were united, and it was the BBC who were saying
otherwise. The thought now entered that this is an agreed and prepared line to
take. But another thought also enters: it’s a pretty lame one. What happens
when it’s Channel 4, or Sky News?
Or perhaps there ‘s a broadcasters’ conspiracy. Back to the drawing board, chaps.
No comments:
Post a Comment