The latest twist in what
is becoming known as Bingogate is the revelation that the infographic describing
“hardworking people” as “they” was not really the work of
Tory Party chairman Grant “Spiv”
Shapps, but was somehow forced on to the poor dear. There are even stories
circulating that Shapps is for the chop over the affair. But all that this does
is show what a shambles the Party has become.
Oh look, someone selling dodgy motahs
How it looked - (c) Doc Hackenbush 2014
The two narratives now going the rounds are, first, that
Shapps was not, in fact, the one wot done it, and second, that he’s going to
get the sack anyway, to be replaced with someone who may be even more utterly
useless. Both have serious credibility hurdles to overcome, not least because
those narratives cannot both be true. But let’s start with the “blameless Grant” angle.
This has
been put forward by Iain Martin, formerly of the Wall Street Journal, writing in the Telegraph, who tells readers “Eyes
down ... how Osborne dodged blame for bingo gaffe ... George Osborne, the
Chancellor, signed off and was 'enthusiastic' about the Tories' controversial
post-Budget bingo poster”.
Here, it was the Rt Hon Gideon George Oliver Osborne, heir to the Seventeenth
Baronet, who done it.
“A small team
of staffers from Tory headquarters was allowed into the Treasury to work with
the Chancellor’s aides on devising political messages aimed at promoting the
Budget ... With the concept and wording agreed the advert was
signed off by the Chancellor as well as by Lynton Crosby, the Tory’s [sic] election strategist, and by Stephen Gilbert,
the Prime Minister’s political secretary” he told.
But, as Martin concedes, “That evening, Mr Shapps tweeted the advert to his followers on the
social networking site Twitter and encouraged them to ‘spread the word’”.
Hardly the action of someone acting under duress. So what of the second
narrative? This has
come from Breitbart London, and so should be treated as highly suspect
unless confirmed. It says Shapps is for the high jump.
The Breitbart line is that “no one person was responsible” for Bingogate, though “Shapps bore final responsibility”. The
one to blame was now Robert Halfon, the populist MP for Harlow, but here a
problem enters: Halfon is a mere back-bencher, and the idea that he can impose
his ideas on the Party leadership is fanciful. Worse, the names touted as Shapps’ replacement are hardly credible.
The two names in the Breitbart frame are Chris Grayling –
er, no, basically – and Esther McVey, which would transfer the Party chairman’s
job from a spiv to an I-Speak-Your-Weight machine. And, of course, both
explanations cannot be wholly true. Meanwhile, there is a poll bounce for the
Tories, but the impression that the Party is out of touch may soon do away with
that.
And the lack of candour over Bingogate just makes them look
shifty. Once more.
No comments:
Post a Comment