The situation in Ukraine is serious and likely to
deteriorate rapidly. So now is not the time for personal grandstanding: this is
way too important to be used for mere self-promotion. Well, it is for most
people, but for the terminally shameless, nothing is off limits. So while the
diplomats talk, and a military confrontation moves closer, one person is using
the crisis for political points scoring and career enhancement.
(c) Doc Hackenbush 2014
Who would do such a callous thing when Ukranian and Russian
troops may soon be squaring up to one another? But you all know that for
professional know-all Louise Mensch, nothing is off limits when it comes to
creating More And Bigger Opportunities For Herself Personally Now. And, as a
good loyal Tory, she uses the whole business as an excuse to lay into the
Labour leadership.
“You can draw a direct
line from [Ed Miliband’s] disgraceful, party political games playing over Syria
to the Ukraine today. A direct line” she stomped, not being sufficiently up
to speed to know that we no longer talk of “the
Ukraine”. Also she is in line with
many Tories peddling the line to bash Mil The Younger, but not with the reality,
that the vote was lost because of a lack of Tory support.
“Had Labour stuck to
their agreement of a brief airstrike on Assad when we still could, Putin would
not have trumped in Syria” she continues, once again ignoring reality. What
is this “brief airstrike” she talks
of? But interesting to know that Putin not only went to Syria – I missed that
in all the excitement – but also suffered a bout of flatulence into the
bargain.
Do we get Obama blaming as well? You betcha, says Sarah: “And had Putin not utterly humiliated Obama
and the West in Syria, mercilessly starving them, he would not have invaded
[Ukraine]”. And, as Jon Stewart might have said, two things here. There
hasn’t (yet) been an invasion, and Putin hasn’t starved anyone, although he has
supported the Assad regime – but that’s not the same thing.
But if you don’t succeed, try, try again – and in Ms Mensch’s
case, fail again: “Our inaction in Syria,
which is laid directly at [Ed Miliband’s] feet, caused this triumphalist move
from Putin”. Plain flat wrong: Moscow deems Ukraine to be within its sphere
of influence – as agreed by Winshton and FDR with Stalin, in case anyone forgot
– and it has naval interests, and a large ethnic Russian minority, in the
country.
And what her urging a bombing of Syria would have achieved
is unclear, so this is revised in the retelling: “Nobody was going to ‘bomb Syria’ they were going to strike Assad’s Presidential palace”. That’s not
what she said at the time: “A targeted
strike against Assad’s chemical
facilities would be right and just”. No palaces involved. In any case,
she knows sweet jack about any intended targets.
But what the heck – shoot
from the hip and Roger Ailes might hear her, right?
3 comments:
This is all really rocking up to be a great #alllaboursfault hashtag come election time
Apparently Russia wanted to have a naval base in Syria but due to the current situation abandoned the idea. Every cloud etc
Into the Valley of Death rode the six hundred with the new Florence Nightingale brandishing her lamp more intent on destruction than saving lives.
Could be subject of a new Fox News video game?
Certainly not game for a laugh.
Post a Comment