When the Rt Hon Gideon George Oliver Osborne, heir to the
Seventeenth Baronet, “threw his weight
behind a proposal to increase the minimum wage to £7 an hour by 2015” last
Thursday, in a blatant attempt to outflank Labour, a move that would
restore the figure to its pre-recession level, he was applauded by the
convocation of Tory nodding donkeys and I-speak-your-weight machines.
But there was a problem: as I’ve noted previously, the
Astroturf lobby groups posing as non-partisan think tanks, which make up such a
significant part of the Conservative Movement, are vehemently opposed to such
radical ideas as paying the lower orders in money, rather than washers. The
likes of the IEA, CPS, ASI and TPA have predicted doom and destruction since the Minimum
Wage appeared.
That was in 1998, and it may be usefully noted that
unemployment did not take off as a result – as these august bodies predicted –
although it did improve the purchasing power of the less well off. And those
are the people with the greatest propensity to spend, so there was more
economic activity as a result, even if the goods and services purchased were
not to the liking of the orthodox right.
So when Osborne made his statement, the Astroturfers were
aghast: here was someone from their preferred team committing the ultimate
economic heresy. Even before the Chancellor’s announcement, Ryan Bourne of the
CPS was
unhappy about burger-flippers getting a rise: “it’s the poorest – for whom a fast food restaurant might be a treat –
who suffer the most” he whinged.
This demonstrates just how out of touch Bourne and all the
other clever people who talk loudly in restaurants really are: the least well
off don’t eat out. But this was not
an isolated view: Mark Littlewood, the IEA’s very own humour-free zone, told
that “This move would ... jeopardise
the jobs of some of the most vulnerable workers in the country”. Yes, won’t
they think about the poor? And the ASI followed suit.
Sam
Bowman opined “A minimum wage
increase will hurt the poor, particularly young people and vulnerable groups
like migrant workers”. Won’t they think about the young and the migrants
too? One can almost hear the orthodox graphs depicting supply and demand being
wheeled out, despite this tactic having so clearly failed in the past. But one
Astroturf group was silent.
And that group was the so-called Taxpayers’ Alliance (TPA),
which has previously railed against the minimum wage, in concert with its pals
out there on the right. Nor has their CEO Jonathan Isaby had anything to say on
the matter. It’s not as if the TPA has mellowed on the issue, so what is the
problem? Is there more upheaval in the offing at Tufton Street? We will no
doubt find out in due course.
In the meantime, expect
more defence of the poor by making them less well off.
2 comments:
A very famous politician once stated:-
"It is a national evil that any class of Her Majesty’s subjects should receive less than a living wage in return for their utmost exertions… where you have what we call sweated trades, you have no organisation, no parity of bargaining, the good employer is undercut by the bad and the bad by the worst; the worker, whose whole livelihood depends upon the industry, is undersold by the worker who only takes up the trade as a second string… where these conditions prevail you have not a condition of progress, but a condition of progressive degeneration."
Who was this politician? A subversive communist or labour party member? No, it was Winston Churchill in 1909 when the Trade Boards Bill was passing through Parliament.
"A very famous politician once stated:"
I'm sure Mr Gove would have passed that history lesson onto the TPA (it seems to be his period) - perhaps the reason they are keeping schtum?
Post a Comment