Today, former Israeli Prime Minister – and military
commander – Ariel Sharon takes his last journey, to his family’s ranch in the
Negev. Sharon, who died on Friday after spending eight years in a coma
following a massive stroke, has been given full state honours, as befits a
former PM and survivor of the 1948 generation, one who fought in the Israeli
war of independence.
Yet Ariel Sharon remains a controversial figure: this is
acknowledged even
by the most conservative of media outlets. One cannot understand the man,
his country, and the times they lived through without understanding this. And
it is the craven inability to see Sharon’s
downsides that marks out The
Commentator, and its almost adulatory obituary,
standing all alone.
It is not for Robin Shepherd and his dwindling band of
firmly right-wing contributors to tell readers that Sharon behaved
insubordinately and recklessly during the 1956 Suez campaign in an unsuccessful
attempt to dislodge Egyptian forces from the Mitla Pass. Nor is the indiscriminate
killing of dozens of Palestinian civilians in a reprisal raid in 1953 even
mentioned.
Sharon continued to have difficulty doing what his superiors
told him to do even when he returned to the IDF on the occasion of the 1973 Yom
Kippur War. Fortunately his side won. But the greatest
stain on his reputation came when, as Defence Minister in the early 80s, he
oversaw
the invasion of Lebanon and soon ratcheted it up into a full-scale war.
What he promised would be over in 24 to 48 hours had already
lasted three months when Christian Phalange militiamen entered the Sabra and Shatila
refugee camps near Beirut and massacred hundreds – perhaps thousands – of Palestinian
refugees. The suspicion that Sharon had caused the IDF to look the other way
was inescapable. The subsequent Kahan report confirmed the suspicion.
Yes, an Israeli
commission of inquiry found Ariel Sharon culpably negligent over the
killings. This is excused by The
Commentator, and Sharon’s visit to the Temple Mount, which triggered the
second Palestinian intifada and set off the wave of suicide bombings and
reprisals is not mentioned. Sharon then portrayed the building of the security
barrier between Israel and the Palestinian territories as inevitable.
Yes, Ariel Sharon fought courageously for his country.
No-one questions this, or detracts from his patriotism. But he, like so many
conviction politicians, will be remembered rather differently, depending on
which side of the Israeli – Palestinian divide you are on, or even, within
Israel, your view of recent history. The
Commentator does his memory no favours by declining to give the full
picture.
It’s a perversely
blinkered view of the world that Robin Shepherd inhabits.
No comments:
Post a Comment