Phil Wilson. No longer an MP
But it gets worse. “We saw a Labour victory in Wakefield of which we can all be proud last month. Activists and campaigners came from across Britain to listen to voters – lifelong Labour voters, people returning to Labour, people new to Labour”. In other words, Labour threw everything at that by-election, something that could not be replicated at a General Election.
Wilson does, though, consider the cost of living crisis, and shows real understanding of what many families are going through right now. Then he moves along to “I want to see more money in parent’s pockets so they can choose the food and supplies that are right for their kids. I want a decent standard of living for everyone, not soup kitchens and food banks used as an excuse to keep benefits low”. And then comes the soundbite.
“Advocates of a ‘right to food’ often point to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights … Pulling food out of that to stand alone means reducing our ambition for our people and our country, not extending it. Prisoners are guaranteed food - the rest of us should have the power to exercise freedom of choice”. In the future when no-one is hungry, perhaps. NOT NOW.
“Reducing our ambition”? REDUCING OUR AMBITION? People are hurting, with no immediate prospect of improvement, NOW. The sunlit uplands where freedom of choice may be exercised come AFTER the basics - like ensuring people do not go hungry. And the prisoner comparison is utterly, totally, bang out of order. Except that many in this country ARE prisoners - of poverty.
One hates to come over all Neil Kinnock, but here we have a former Labour MP - a former Labour MP - talking cheap soundbites in order to wave away real concern from a wide coalition of campaigners. It is just jaw-dropping.
One look at the responses to the LabourList Tweet advertising the piece is all you will need to see the strength of feeling, the certainty that he has got it wrong, and the sense of sheer revulsion that someone in the Labour Party - that’s the Labour Party that is supposed to stand up for working people - is dismissing an anti-poverty campaign because it’s “reducing our ambition”.
This article may be effective in one way only - to turn people off joining, and indeed campaigning for, the Labour Party. It’s no good banging on about how wonderful the victory in Wakefield was, when activists are becoming disenchanted by a leadership that is seen as standing for nothing in particular. Activists who will be needed come the next General Election.
Activists who will recoil at crapulous soundbites like “reducing our ambition” and turn away from Labour. And that cannot be blamed on Jeremy Corbyn.
If Wilson’s soundbite becomes accepted as Labour thinking, Labour isn’t going to win next time. Lecturing the hungry about ambition? Get in the sea.
https://www.patreon.com/Timfenton
3 comments:
You are wrong, Tim.
Quisling "Labour" isn't "...standing for nothing in particular..."
It stands for toryism, red variety.
Wilson shows it also stands for the long-discredited Friedman Chicago Gangster School - which even loony old Friedman admitted was wrong before he croaked.
One of the reasons der führer rose to power is what one German claimed, "Yes, Hitler took our freedom. He took our freedom to starve."
Not that an utter moron like Wilson would understand the context. The fucking idiot. No wonder even constituents in one of many deprived areas kicked his ridiculous gobshitery into the long grass. A male Esther McVey and just as thick.
Parliamentary opposition is much more fun than actually being in power - I learned that in the 70s.
Looks a bit like Austin, if you squint.
Sounds a bit like Austin. Oh dear!
Post a Comment