Before passing sentence in the hacking trial, Mr Justice
Saunders passed
severely adverse comment on the behaviour of those in charge at the
now-defunct Screws when Milly Dowler
went missing. They had, he concluded, acted not in the interests of the Dowler
family, but in their own narrow interests, which meant, more or less, that
their actions were geared towards selling more newspapers.
In other words, the public interest defence was being used
as a fig-leaf to cover for whatever behaviour the papers would like to get up
to. And this takes us to the Mallorcan resort of Magaluf, otherwise known as
Megaruf, or even Shagaluf. For those wanting a restful holiday, Magaluf is a
Mediterranean version of Siberia: everyone knows where it is, but nobody wants
to go there.
And for those who look for excess of, well, just about
everything, Magaluf is the place to be. Drunkenness and sexual intimacy among
those in the resort surprise nobody – or rather, they didn’t, until the Sun and Daily Star found themselves in need of a quick Shock Horror sales
boost. One story of a young woman letting herself go was all it needed: all then
piled in.
“Binge-drink Brits
sink to new low as girl performs 24 sex
acts for £4 cocktail ... MAGALEWD” thundered the Super Soaraway Currant
Bun, not masking the identity of the young woman concerned very well, and
perhaps not by accident. As a result, her identity was revealed and her social
media accounts were subsequently closed down following a shed load of abuse.
Then along came the Daily
Star, with “24 Sex Acts For One Free
Drink ... Brit teen’s holiday shame”. Yes, this was clearly A Very Bad
Thing, but leering after women was not, as a look at the left side of the page
showed a scantily clad Victoria Pendleton with the caption “Phwoar de France”. This
was noted by Holly Baxter at the Guardian:
the tabloids were attempting to “police women’s sexuality”.
And, as if to prove her right, back
came the Daily Star, with “Magaluf: Shock New Sex Tape ... Brits’
full-on filth in front of clubbers”. Sex is “filth”? Well, the Star
thought it was, going into more detail that we need to here. And, again, the
young woman concerned is not exactly anonymised. So the window is left open for
the Mail to wade in and get righteous
on all concerned (see HERE,
HERE
and HERE).
So the red-tops sell a few more papers, and the Mail frightens its readers against all
those “out-of-control” youngsters.
But, for one young woman, it is a truly frightening experience as she is
splashed all over the tabloids in a blatant act of exploitation. All of which
takes us back to the hacking trial: there was no public interest in this story.
It was all about selling papers, and stuff anyone else’s feelings.
This was not the tabloids’ finest hour. And what’s worse, they don’t care.
2 comments:
Horrible. Completely agree.
I wonder how thoroughly the tabloids check their stories? "and somehow she dropped her Godly protection for a moment"
Er, she went to Magaluf, presumably with the knowledge and agreement of her parents. Unless it is also known for its ecclesiastical architecture, what sense does that make?
Post a Comment