Tube strikes? Londoners, the Daily Mail wasted no time in telling its readers, were sick and
tired of them. And there could
be only one villain of the piece: Bob Crow. He was a militant! He got paid
a salary and pension contributions too! He still lived in a council house (and
a photo was helpfully provided, so readers knew where to find him)! He
sometimes ate out at decent restaurants!
Unfunny and talentless churnalist Richard Littlejohn was
in no doubt as to Crow’s malign influence: “Barbados Bob, great train robber who uses industrial brute force to
make rail passengers stand and deliver” he declared only last February,
before telling another load of whoppers about Clive Jenkins, which he can get
away with because the former union leader is long dead.
Dicky Windbag even
surmised “For some time now I have
suspected that Bob Crow is an MI5 agent ... If you tried to invent a man to
discredit and destroy the trades union movement from within, there could be no
finer candidate ... Bob Crow seems determined to bring down not only his own
union but the entire TUC”. Interesting way of saying “he did exactly what he was elected to do”, that.
And then Crow got
a pay rise! “Militant union baron Bob
Crow has brushed aside calls for wage restraint – and quietly pocketed an
astonishing 12 per cent pay rise. The
hardline general secretary of the Rail Maritime and Transport union has taken
the £10,000 salary increase, despite the painful pay freeze affecting millions
of workers in both the public and private sectors”
howled the Mail in protest.
One could have been forgiven for getting the impression from the Mail’s characteristically hostile coverage that there were only tube strikes because of Crow, and that, were someone else at the helm of the RMT Union, all would be well. I mean, he was not only “militant”, but “hardline” too! And he claimed expenses! And on top of that, he claimed travel costs!
One could have been forgiven for getting the impression from the Mail’s characteristically hostile coverage that there were only tube strikes because of Crow, and that, were someone else at the helm of the RMT Union, all would be well. I mean, he was not only “militant”, but “hardline” too! And he claimed expenses! And on top of that, he claimed travel costs!
Then the Daily
Mail, and all the other repositories of right-leaning frothing and ranting,
unexpectedly got their wish when Crow died
suddenly last month. Now he was no longer around, there would surely be a
more conciliatory and moderate tone from the union’s leadership. Wouldn’t
there? Er, no there wouldn’t: five days of strike
action have been called, starting in less than a fortnight’s time.
So what does the Mail have
to say about that? “The
industrial action announced by the RMT Union today will be the first since the
death of its firebrand leader Bob Crow last month”. What they really mean
is that they wanted Crow still to be around, so the hacks could have a clear
target for their ire, someone they could demonise and use to flog more papers.
Now it’s just strikes and no convenient bogeyman.
And proof that Bob Crow wasn’t especially militant,
hardline, or anything else.
No comments:
Post a Comment