PHONEHACKGATE TAKE 2
Anyone who thought that Phonehackgate was just about the
hiring of Glenn Mulcaire by the Screws
may need to think again: this
morning, six former hacks on the paper, two of whom are now at the Sun, were
arrested as part of a fresh phone hacking investigation. Who was doing the
hacking and tapping is not as yet clear, but for other papers this could be
ominous news.
May not be just him this time
I will explain. Mulcaire was employed more or less
exclusively by the Screws. So when he
was nicked and his meticulously kept records seized, that was the only paper to
get mired in the subsequent revelations. When Steve Whittamore had his house
raided in March 2003, almost all those who scrabble around the dunghill that is
Grubstreet featured in his records.
And the top two in the Motorman charts did not include a
Murdoch title: these places were occupied by Trinity Mirror and Associated
Newspapers (the former managed the most information requests for a single
paper, while the latter had the largest aggregate total, at 985). As Nick
Davies pointed out in Flat Earth News,
“overwhelmingly, the requests which had
been made of Whittamore involved breaking the law”.
Now, if the gang was all present and correct in pre-hacking
days, the idea that only the Screws
took the intrusion to the next level is not credible. The whiff of suspicion
has hovered around the Mirror for
some time, despite the denials of Piers Morgan, and the Daily Mail’s denials have never been convincing.
Why should this be? Again, Nick Davies has the quote, this
time from a long serving Mail man: “if the Mail go for you, they get every phone
number you have dialled, every schoolmate, everything on your credit card,
every call from your phone, and from your mobile”. Mail hacks agreed with Davies that they had bribed Police officers
and civil servants.
Now contrast that with the denials before the Leveson
Inquiry by the legendarily foul mouthed Paul Dacre. And also consider a
report by the Independent back in
December 2011 on Police seizures of computers from a variety of private
investigators, with the estimate that the numbers hacked could equal those at
the Screws. This investigation was
not limited to one title.
That is why the latest arrests may not just be about more
illegal activity at the Screws. It
may unearth a whole raft of dodgy information gathering, and in the process,
drop a lot of very senior journalists and their bosses in the mire. Just like
the first Guardian reports on
Phonehackgate back in 2009, few have their eyes on this particular ball. With the post Leveson debate heating up,
that may not be wise.
1 comment:
Which tabloid was most vehement in its criticism of the Guardian's articles as exaggeration and leftie troublemaking before the scandal blew up? Yep, the one edited by lfm PD.
Post a Comment