The allegations of a known paedophile being a close aide to
a former Prime Minister seem to be getting shunted off as the
North Wales care home scandal is revisited and a little whataboutery is entered
into. Conveniently for the Tory Party, the names that are being fed to the
Fourth Estate to satisfy their appetite for playing the blame game are dead,
rather like Jimmy Savile.
Latest
name to enter the frame is Peter Morrison, who was for
many years MP for Chester, and was warned about his activities by the
Metropolitan Police following his cruising around the Sussex Gardens area and “cottaging” in nearby Gents toilets,
where he picked up young men who were under the homosexual age of consent at
the time, that being set at 21.
Added to that is another unnamed “aide”, who is also dead. This makes it rather easier to divert
attention away from a number of Tory aides and current and former MPs who I
discussed on Sunday last. All of the seven
figures to whom I gave a range of clues are very much alive. And there is
one other problem with exploring the avenue of Only Dead People.
Labour MP Tom Watson, who brought this issue kicking and
screaming back to centre stage last week, said categorically that Morrison was
not the “senior aide” that he had
identified. It could not possibly be: that person is alive, and duly threatened
to issue proceedings against the BBC if he were named on last Friday’s edition
of Newsnight. So why the change in
direction?
Well, consider where the accusation against Morrison is
coming from – Rod Richards, who is a Tory MP. What a coincidence! But rather
than the press pausing to stop and think, they have taken Richards’ accusation
as read, because he was involved in the original inquiry. But the files from
that inquiry have not, despite calls from the opposition, been reopened.
So we don’t know just how deeply Morrison was implicated.
Worse, as
the Mail has reported, Richards “could not offer anything to substantiate his
claims against Morrison” and that the Waterhouse Inquiry “had not uncovered any evidence to link Morrison
to the abuse”. So, media people, what on earth are you doing taking this on
trust without any evidence to back it up?
Think on for a moment: the
Tory Party is implicated by Tom Watson. Several names of living current and
former MPs, and other party figures, are pitched. Watson stresses that Morrison
is not one of them. And then a serving Tory MP effectively shouts to the press
pack “Look Over There!” and the sheep
duly oblige. We should not allow Rod Richards to bounce anyone into the wrong
conclusion.
Unless he can back up his claims, Richards should be
ignored. He’s a party plant.
2 comments:
*Ahem*. Rod Richards has not been an MP since 1997, and resigned from the Welsh Assembly in 2002.
Tim, I don't understand you here.
Rod Richard was a Welsh Office Minister. He got briefings as the inquiry went along. He wouldn't have seen the actual evidence, so no wonder he can't substantiate it now.
He's dropped Hague in it too. Hardly a great diversion.
Post a Comment