
It was to the yet further relief of all those Labour members who took Keir Starmer at his word when he made his pitch for the Labour leadership, who were lied to in order to get them to back McSweeney’s chosen candidate, the reasoning of The Great Mastermind being that they, like all those voters, would have to return to Labour as they had no other political home.
But, sad to say for the Labour Together clique, the deeply unpleasant McSweeney departing the stage is not going to be the end of it. Not only that, the rest of that clique, especially its most visible representatives, know it, but being of less than perfect courage, are lying low right now, while their hero and his “allies” brief our free and fearless press in a rewriting of reality.
Especially mirth-inducing has been Alex “Billy Liar” Wickham claiming “Allies of Morgan McSweeney say he was not responsible for Peter Mandelson’s appointment, contrary to the narrative pushed by Labour’s soft-left”. Narrative, well-sourced, pushed by the real world, more like. Starmer took the decision to appoint Mandelson, but McSweeney was the cheerleader.
It got worse, with “a colleague” adding “an incalculable loss to the government that has devastated those who know how much he has done for Labour. How fitting that his final act in government is to take full responsibility for others’ mistakes, as he has done for years”. Like he took responsibility for Sue Gray. And Angela Rayner? Nah, someone else briefed against her.

What happens next? Steve Howell is another focusing on Labour Together: “McSweeney has resigned, but his collaborators are still there. Labour has no chance of a political recovery unless it completely clears out the discredited Labour Together faction, including [Steve] Reed, [Pat] McFadden, [Wes] Streeting, [John] Healey, [Shabana] Mahmood and Starmer himself”.
Any advance on those names? Martin O’Neill has another: “Now that Morgan McSweeney has 'resigned' as chief of staff, if the Labour Party has any hope of restoring any of its reputation, others figures who were close to Mandelson and did his dirty work also need to be removed. Josh Simons also has to go”. Simons, it seems, commissioned the surveillance of critical journalists.
Pamela Fitzpatrick has another very interesting name to add. “In June 2023 I was trying to make a complaint to Lords Standards about Mandelson’s close association with known peadophile Epstein. Meanwhile Luke Akehurst MP was inviting Mandelson to be guest speaker at a Labour First Dinner”. Careful there, you don’t want to be accused of anti-Semitism!
So will McSweeney’s departure be the end of it? Almost certainly not: if Labour does not just lose the Gorton and Denton by-election, but comes third in a formerly safe seat, and has a seriously bad round of local election results in May, Starmer will be out, if he hasn’t walked already. And no amount of spin, on the subject of how much more electable he is, will save him.
McSweeney is out. Starmer will soon follow him. Just rejoice at that news.
https://www.patreon.com/Timfenton

3 comments:
Oh dear.
What WILL the Micawberite fanboys do if and when their "heroes" are indeed fucked off to the Epstein sewer they belong in. Tebbitland in uproar, one way or the other. They'll be eating their own rotting livers.
As Gore Vidal once wrote, "The four sweetest words are 'I told you so ' ".
Tremendous comedy scenes in Britain's wholly far right corporate media today.
Use of the phrase "Stab in the back" for opposition to the Quisling Starmer.
By coincidence* the same phrase used by the Nazis en route to power.
*Not really. Gobshites gonna gobshite, any time, any place.
McSweeney.
It's not just about Mandelson. The Quislings rottenness goes MUCH DEEPER.
Here's the details:
https://open.substack.com/pub/councilestatemedia/p/the-truth-about-morgan-mcsweeney?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=2j9682
Post a Comment