Richard Sharp - now in the firing line
Sadly for The Blue Team, though, the parallels with John Major’s miserable run of sleaze stories in the mid-1990s continues: as Zahawi fades from view, back into the news comes disgraced formerly alleged Prime Minister Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson, and an £800,000 loan. This involved the presence of one Richard Sharp, who is now Chairman of the BBC.
He was appointed to his role at the Beeb by Bozo himself. And as if the concept of gifting your fixer such a job sets ethical alarm bells ringing, they should be clanging off the wall at what is now being revealed - not merely about what Sharp and Bozo said in their defence, but more pertinently how those explanations have unravelled with giddying speed.
It was the Times and Sunday Times - showing that Bozo is no longer a favourite of the Murdoch Mafiosi - that have been pursuing the story, as LBC host Sangita Myska observed: “According to [the Times], Cabinet Secretary Simon Case ‘appears to have been involved in facilitating and clearing the £800,000 (from Sam Blythe to Boris Johnson) then deciding it could be kept secret’. Simon Case is the most senior civil servant in Government”.
So Case is another who may find himself thrown under the bus very soon. He was also the author of a letter to Johnson telling “Given the imminent announcement of Richard Sharp as the new BBC Chairman it is important that you no longer ask his advice about your personal financial matters”.
There was only one problem with that urging: Bozo had already told, via his spokesman, that “This is rubbish. Richard Sharp has never given any financial advice to Boris Johnson, nor has Mr Johnson sought any financial advice from him. There has never been any remuneration or compensation to Mr Sharp from Boris Johnson for this or any other service”.
Robbie Gibb demonstrates his impartiality
But it is Sharp who looks the most likely to find those journalists who have not yet been hobbled sniffing around his part in the continuing sleaze exposure. Pogrund again: “Sharp went to see Simon Case on 4 December, a week before his final BBC interview. Nobody else attended and - contrary to initial suggestions - official position is now that no minutes were taken”. Ho yus.
Where might they sniff? “Johnson and Sharp continue to say Sharp never provided any financial advice [looks very shaky indeed right now] … Sharp says he had no involvement in the loan by 22 Dec, when PET letter was sent … Ex-PM says he had no knowledge of British Council application”. Bozo is known for his propensity to talk well, but lie badly. What of Sharp?
If he has been economical with the actualité, he has to either resign from his BBC role, or be caused to resign. And then the rest of the Tory infiltration and wrecking of a formerly trusted public service broadcaster has to follow him out the door. The prognosis for Sharp is not good: he has already contradicted himself on whether he interfered in the Corporation’s news coverage.
Who might be in pole position to follow him out? Step forward “rabid Brexiteer” Robbie Gibb, who has probably damaged the Beeb’s credibility more than any one individual. The EU referendum coverage was lame in the extreme, with Vote Leave allowed to lie blatantly and constantly, and not get called out for it, in the name of trying to “both sides” the debate.
Because whatever your view of Kier Starmer, a Labour General Election victory would bring, with the certainty of night following day, a clear out of the Tory infiltration from the BBC, along with banishment of the Tufton Street propagandists from the Corporation’s news coverage. By then, Sharp would most likely be long gone, and if Gibb was still there, he soon wouldn’t be.
The great unravelling of Tory influence has begun. The sleaze and corruption will probably soon sink the Tories. Not even the press can stop it this time.
https://www.patreon.com/Timfenton
6 comments:
Why would Johnson need an introduction from a 3rd party to his own cousin?
Some of his own children need a 3rd party introduction
Johnson may need introductions to his own offspring: perhaps it’s not so far-fetched he would need one for a third cousin.
Glad to see another post. I miss your rants!
Three questiins
1) Why did Bozo need an £800k unsecured loan?
2? Who was the lender?
3) Why would anyone lend him such a huge sum?
4) Who in theirright mind would expect him to repay it?
Post a Comment