Yesterday
brought the moment for Young Dave to tell those ghastly foreigners exactly
where they jolly well got off: at the last stop before the UK border, and don’t
even think about free movement. Except it didn’t happen: Cameron did not
announce any kind of EU migrant quota. So he was going to get jolly tough with
all the other EU member states, only not quite as tough as he said previously.
The realisation that Dave would not be telling Johnny
Foreigner to Frog Off or Stick It Up Your Juncker was the main reason that the
right-wing press, with the exception of the Express,
left news of his speech off the front pages. When Macer Hall proclaimed “Migrant Controls Or We’ll Quit EU”, one
had to wonder if he had actually read the text of Cameron’s speech.
What, then, was being proposed? There would be a curtailing
of in-work benefits, such as tax credits and housing benefit, unless the
applicant had been here four years. And a refusal to let in anyone without a
job offer, but then, anyone from another EU member state can come here to visit
– without precondition – so that one of Dave’s “red lines” is dead on arrival.
Where was the quota, the restriction on issuing National
Insurance numbers? There wasn’t one. And, the more extensive the trawl both in
countries like Poland, and among migrant communities in the UK, the more
obvious the conclusion: they aren’t coming here for the benefits, and many don’t
claim them – heck, many of them don’t know
they can claim them.
There would be a restriction on migrants’ access to social
housing, but one look at a town like Crewe shows why this too would be
pointless: there is a large private rental sector and no need for most migrants
to apply for social housing provision. The
reality of Cameron’s position was left to the Guardian, with “Merkel forces
Cameron retreat”, and Independent,
with “Cameron forced to retreat on
migration”.
All that was left was spin, with the Sun’s non-bullying political editor Tom Newton Dunn telling “Migrant climbdown proves Cam thinks he’ll
win in 2015” (no it doesn’t – see Guardian
and Independent). He was backed up by
the serially clueless Tim Montgomerie, who thought Phonehackgate was Labour payback
for Damian McBride, calling the highly suspect analysis “spot on”.
There was
also spin from the appalling Quentin Letts (let’s not), who told “The speech itself was elegantly argued,
jauntily written, far better than some recent efforts which have slipped into
Blair-Brownish verbless, one-line-paragraph robot-ese”. So he didn’t want
to talk about that climbdown to the Germans, either.
The reality is that Dave knew he couldn’t get what he
originally shot his gob off about. So he backed down and hoped nobody would
notice. Got that wrong.
1 comment:
Cameron becomes more detached from reality by the day. He talks more and more and says less and less to ensure he stays on the bandwagon.
Imagine how quickly Heathrow would sieze up if every passenger arriving had to prove they weren't coming to the UK merely to sign on!
.
Post a Comment