There has been a
flurry of revelation concerning the late Cyril Smith, formerly Lib Dem MP
for Rochdale, who has over many years been accused of
being a paedophile, and abusing his positions at a school in the town, and
at a boys’ hostel which he helped to set up. The sad conclusion is that those
who could, and should, have acted at the time turned a blind eye.
Dead Paedos, Guv? Just make it up, innit?!?
Over at the Daily Mail,
the legendarily foul mouthed Paul Dacre clearly concluded that he could not
allow Channel 4’s Dispatches to hog
all the limelight on what was the kind of why-oh-why story that his paper
revels in running, and so his unfunny and tedious churnalist Richard Littlejohn
was summoned from his Vero Beach poolside to lay into the Police, MI5, and
anyone else he could kick.
“Who
gave Cyril Smith the keys to the sweet shop?” demands Littlejohn
today, making a connection with Jimmy Savile – easy to do, as both are dead,
and so won’t sue – and generally churning over the content already broadcast,
while asking why the authorities didn’t do something at the time. And, as he
churns away, Dicky Windbag lets slip that he hasn’t done his homework.
“Now it’s claimed that
the Funny People covered up for Cyril Smith, who was heavily involved in
the negotiations to prop up Jim Callaghan’s Labour government with Liberal
support ... Someone must have given the orders, maybe a senior politician still
sitting in the House of Lords today”, he asserts, and, as Jon Stewart might
have said, two things here.
One, it is entirely possible that one former MP is right now
considering whether to consult his lawyers, given Littlejohn and his editor can’t
stand up the “maybe” part of that
quote. And two, what was known as the “Lib-Lab
Pact” had in fact run its course when the Cyril Smith accusations were
first aired at a national level by Private
Eye magazine – in May 1979.
In fact, not only had the Liberals pulled the plug on their
pact with Jim Callaghan’s by then minority Labour Government, but by the time
the Eye published, it was a week after
the 1979 General Election, by which time Labour had been defeated by Margaret
Thatcher and the Tories. Littlejohn has, in his haste to cobble together a
suitably righteous rant, got his timeline totally wrong.
Private Eye issue 454 (click for larger image)
As for the allegations that were aired by the Eye at the time, here they are again for
you to peruse (you can read my previous post on the affair HERE).
Cyril Smith may well have had friends covering his tracks, notably his fellow
politicians in Rochdale, and enough in the Police and security services to sweep
the whole business under the carpet. But Littlejohn’s suggestion of Westminster
politicians is speculation.
That is made to look even more clumsy by his timeline goof. Same old Littlejohn.
2 comments:
Littlejohn is as usual being an idiot.Any story is worthwhile if it attacks the the DM's usual victims:the BBC,NHS and Lib Dems. Less easy to defend is the Dispatches doc.The evidence about Cambridge House is strong (of course, we don't know how it would have stood up in court).But no corroboration at all was offered for the story about Ashford remand centre. No clues about what murder was being investigated, no attempt to stand up story about special branch men (would they really have waited till the cop was on the doorstep before they intervened?) No attempt to trace youth concerned or the other people he named.Sounds like an ex-cop yarn. The worker from Knowl View seems well-intentioned but his story has varied from account to account.It would be interesting to know if any other staff members can confirm the story about the master key (just like Savile,y'know).To judge from contemporary reports, Smith was about the only staff member not involved in abuse. And could it be that a solicitor from Pannone ( the firm for whom historic abuse is the new whiplash) is not the most objective commentator?
Notice also, in the same column, that Littlejohn fails to mention which party the blundering councillor in Ryedale belongs to. I'll let you make your own mind up which party Councillor Cussons represents.
Post a Comment