And working in his favour is the right-leaning part of our free and fearless press, in which there are still plenty of influential voices prepared to tell the world that OK, maybe he is an SOB, but he’s their SOB. So it is that the increasingly desperate and downmarket Telegraph tells readers today “MPs accused of moving goalposts over Partygate”. They’re batting for Bozo.
So is the Murdoch Times, splashing with the headline “Lockdown parties inquiry is unlawful and biased, says Johnson”. But the actual substance of his defence, er, isn’t. Times political editor Steven Swinford has spelt it out: "There is no 'bombshell' Whatsapp message. There is one message - already referred to by the committee as setting out a 'line to take' - which Johnson argues supports his case. There are some other documents showing Johnson sought assurances, but just the one Whatsapp message”.
And for those responding “Yebbut Sue Gray Labour, eh?” Swinford notes “It's also worth noting that for all the furore surrounding Sue Gray - including Johnson personally criticising her - her move to Labour *is not* being referenced in his legal submission”. And it gets worse. A lot worse.
If the line to take is that rules were not broken, that does not mean rules were not broken. It’s not a legal opinion. Moreover, whatever the line to take, Bozo should have known what the rules were, if only because he was on TV regularly during the pandemic telling the public what they were.
As the BBC has reminded us, “The former prime minister faces a crucial televised evidence session in front of the Commons Privileges Committee on Wednesday. The committee is yet to publish its final verdict - but its initial update earlier this month said Mr Johnson may have misled Parliament multiple times. Mr Johnson denies misleading MPs”. He would, wouldn’t he?
Do go on. “Wednesday's session, which could last up to five hours, will be a key chance for Mr Johnson to persuade the seven cross-party MPs [with a Tory majority] who make up the committee that he did not mislead MPs in December 2021 … Sources close to Mr Johnson say he will publish a ‘compelling dossier’ that will provide evidence and arguments that he did not knowingly mislead parliament”. And if he fails to convince them?
“If he … is found guilty, he could be suspended from the Commons, and even faces a recall petition, which would trigger a by-election, if that suspension is for more than 10 days … Crucially, though, MPs would have to approve any sanction on Mr Johnson”. But it will be a free vote. Which means one thing.
Those Tories who have concluded that it’s time for Bozo to leave the stage can vote as they see fit. Their only problem is the last line of Bozo loyalists - the vindictive and deluded constituency associations who have already deselected some of their colleagues for being insufficiently loyal to him.
Also, Bozo’s press pals won’t like it, especially the prospect of a by-election in Uxbridge and South Ruislip which the Tories are, right now, a racing certainty to lose. He might have been an election winner in 2019, but his behaviour during the pandemic caused revulsion among many of those who had been conned into voting Tory because it would “Get Brexit Done”.
The time of Bozo was for a time, but not for all time. Just rejoice at that news.
https://www.patreon.com/Timfenton
Yeah, but "it was only once".....as BBC tory Bruce would say.
ReplyDelete'The line I shoot,
ReplyDeleteWill never miss,
The way I make love to 'em,
They can't resist'
Difficult to imagine Johnson or his aides as big Bo Diddley or Muddy Waters fans. But who knows? After all, possession (or retrieval) of his mojo (a hoodoo-related amulet believed to make the bearer irresistibly sexually attractive) was once used in connection with the unlikely stud-muffin, Michael Gove.
Johnson will need all the help he can get on Wednesday, so maybe he's tunefully vouchsafing these words to Carrie and Dilyn at this very moment:
'I think I go down
To old Kansas too
I'm gonna bring back my second cousin
That's little Johnny Cocheroo'
No doubt Richard Sharp could broker another loan from this distant relation while he's in London too.
Hey, Anonymous
ReplyDeleteI know you're obsessed with Starmer's coiffure but 'Quiffed Quisling' is getting a bit boring.
We all deserve a change now so in a spirit of fraternal solidarity, and because, as I'm sure you're well aware and are celebrating in your own way, it's International Day of Happiness, I'm going to offer you, free of charge and with no Ts and Cs, 'Pompadoured Petain'.
There you are. No thanks necessary.
@17:07.
ReplyDeleteBest you "offer" it to the far right Quiff Quisling.
He'll do anything to get a temporary tenancy of Downing Street. Like Blair/Brown's bought-and-paid for "jolly' with the OzYank "born again Christian" Murdoch and illegal mass murder wars. That sort of thing.
It's what far right office-seeking cowards do. Only the coiffure and dress/uniform changes. In the Quisling's case it's a 1950s Joe McCarthy re-do without the hair oil slick, and "policies" to match.
Just enough to keep Britain's curtain-twitchers in their Rothermere Daily Heil/Murdoch Scum niche.
That's how Britain has "worked" for the last 44 years. The Quiff Quisling will ensure that goes on. Oily hair or no oily hair....and creepy "personality" to go with it.
Have a nice Micawber day.