While I’m sure the Murdoch empire will vehemently deny that
anyone from the top of the organisation leans on the editors of the Sun and Times, both titles have displayed a remarkable unanimity this
morning in their coverage of the Hacking Trial, and the partial verdicts handed
down yesterday (the jury is still deliberating on charges against Andy Coulson
and Clive Goodman).
That's what I think of youse bladdy hacking victims, you pommie bastards!
And what both titles want their readers to do is look at the
twinkle-toed yet domestically combative Rebekah Brooks, while not looking at
Coulson, and certainly not any of the other Murdoch stalwarts who have already ‘fessed
up to being involved in phone hacking. On top of that, if you’re expecting Rupe’s
troops to say sorry for any of their less than totally ethical behaviour,
forget it.
Indeed, the mood in the Super Soaraway Currant Bun is
nothing short of triumphalist: “Great Day
For Red Tops” screams the headline, under the teaser telling “Old Bailey Sensation”, as if a jury
declaring itself unable to convict beyond reasonable doubt is “sensational”, rather than the normal
result of due process. Look, readers, she got off, and that’s all you need to know.
The Times – oh,
how far this former paper of record has fallen – wanted its readers to get the
same message. “Brooks Not Guilty”, it
declared. There is, as with the Sun,
a large photo of Ms Brooks, which tells readers that she is the news, and the
news is about her. No other thought need enter. This approved line extended to
the Usual Suspects among the grovelling punditerati.
So the Sun’s
non-bullying political editor Tom Newton Dunn obediently instructed his Twitter
followers to Look Over There: “Serious
questions for the Crown Prosecution Service after Rebekah and Charlie Brooks,
plus PA Cheryl Carter, cleared of all hacking charges”. No mention of
Coulson. No mention of all the others who pleaded guilty, rather than face
trial. And no mention of all the victims.
It was also business as usual for the routinely clueless Tim
Montgomerie, who also wanted everyone to Look Over There: “Cameron assumed Coulson was innocent until proven guilty. Most of UK
assumed Brooks guilty until she was acquitted today. Rush to judgment?” he
opined. It wasn’t about Cameron assuming anything, and most of the population
probably didn’t have an opinion on Ms Brooks.
Then there was Adam “don’t
you know who I am?” Boulton, an appallingly immodest man with much to be
modest about, who wanted anyone not yet asleep to also Look Over There: “Rumours Hacked Off about to rename itself
Very Hacked Off” he snarked. Laugh? I thought I’d never start. But good to
see he still wants an in with the Murdochs and their hangers-on.
Meanwhile, the thousands of hacking victims don’t even get
an apology. Sickening.
From Dominc Ponsford in Press Gazette:
ReplyDelete"But, sadly for those involved, this story is far from over. By my reckoning some 23 journalists charged with criminal offences over the last three years have yet to stand trial. And there are a further 13 arrested journalists still on police bail - including four from Trinity Mirror.
Yesterday was indeed a great day for one red top, but I fear there is much pain yet to come for the red top press."
I suspect some journalists are still "very hacked off"? Plausible deniability still works for some?