So the circumferentially challenged Communities Secretary
Eric Pickles has paused between visits to the curry house to send the men from
KPMG to try and find wrongdoing at Tower Hamlets Town Hall, especially because
elected Mayor Lutfur Rahman has
been featured on a Panorama programme
where Pickles was doing his tough guy act. So he’s had to follow through.
What will be found, however, is not clear: lack of
transparency and favouring one group over another for grant awards which
represent a tiny fraction of the council’s total spend is not a hanging
offence, and much worse charges could be levelled at London’s occasional Mayor
Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson. That last may explain the eagerness of
Bozza’s pal Andrew “transcription error”
Gilligan.
“Over the next few
weeks, this blog will be setting out in detail the truth about Lutfur Rahman,
the extremist-linked mayor of Tower Hamlets, and the full evidence against him.
I should stress that, over the last four years, all our material about Lutfur
and his extremist allies has survived literally hundreds of complaints to Ofcom
and the Press Complaints Commission” he
declares airily.
That would be “for
some value of truth”: for instance, the only link between Rahman and
extremism is that made by Gilligan. Moreover, being excused by the PCC is no
big deal, as Primly Stable found when they let off Richard Littlejohn for lying
(“it’s a comment piece so it’s OK”).
Worse for those seeking original content, all that Gilligan is offering is a
recycling of his back catalogue.
This is allied to an attempt to trash anyone offering
a more nuanced perspective, or waiting to see some real evidence before
rushing to judgment. So the Guardian’s
Dave Hill is subjected to routine abuse, including assertions that he is a “Rahman supporter” and that he “has embarrassing form as Ken Livingstone’s
chief media poodle”. Thus Gilligan sells the pass.
If he had a half-decent case to put against the Tower
Hamlets Mayor, Gilligan would not need to engage in afters against other
journalists: this merely shows his weakness and vanity. As one London observer
told me recently, Gilligan wants above all for other commentators to be his
friend, to see his point of view and share his cause. He can be remarkably
petulant to those not thus persuaded.
Nevertheless, Bozza’s main Telegraph cheerleader has seen fit to follow his first slice of
recycling on “Muslim favouritism” with
a second on “council assets and close
personal allies”, probably in the belief that Pickles will see fit to
favour him – who knows, perhaps there may be more work in prospect for
sick-makingly loyal attack dogs, however risible their credibility.
But whatever happens to Rahman, don’t expect Gilligan to have influenced it.
I see you are in Crewe and not Tower Hamlets which is where I am. Everything Gilligan has said about Lutfur Rahman is true, and there is much more to come.
ReplyDelete