[Update at end of post]
Today, for the tabloid part of the Fourth Estate, is a slow news day. We know this because four papers have revisited the case of Madeleine McCann for the umpteenth time: the possibility that parents Kate and Gerry were asked about yet more wall-to-wall coverage beforehand is not unadjacent to zero. So what has caused the Mail, Express, Mirror and Daily Star to act in concert?
Today, for the tabloid part of the Fourth Estate, is a slow news day. We know this because four papers have revisited the case of Madeleine McCann for the umpteenth time: the possibility that parents Kate and Gerry were asked about yet more wall-to-wall coverage beforehand is not unadjacent to zero. So what has caused the Mail, Express, Mirror and Daily Star to act in concert?
Simples. A review
into the disappearance of the then three-year-old has been concluded by the
Metropolitan Police, and has identified a number of “persons of interest” (or “suspects”,
depending on which account you read). This number varies between “a handful” in the Express to “more than 20”
in the Mail. Moreover, someone has
once again said Madeleine could still be alive.
And that is all that is needed for the headline writers:
from “Scotland
Yard breakthrough ... Police Identify Maddie Suspects” in the Express, to “Maddie:
Cops Hunt NEW Suspects” in the Daily
Star, to “Maddie:
20 New Suspects” in the Mail,
and “Brit
Cops Bombshell ... She May Be Alive” in the Mirror, the screaming headlines have poured out.
But there is also a further agenda to pursue, and that is
kicking anyone who talks foreign (plus, of course, this is the EU we’re talking
about, so it must by definition be A Very Bad Thing). The Mirror tells how “detectives
... urge Portuguese Police to reopen the case” and the Mail is at its most judgmental: “Yard identifies fresh names ... but Portuguese won’t act”. Curses!
Foiled by those dastardly foreigners!
As with so many of the stories that papers like the Mail report in that selective style
intended to lead readers to the desired conclusion, the small print gives the
game away. When Paul Dacre’s finest tell “behind
the scenes, a major diplomatic row is brewing because the Portuguese
authorities are adamant they will not reopen the inquiry” they are not
telling the whole story.
Because there is a very good reason for that action: “Officials in Lisbon have told their British
counterparts that under Portuguese laws, they can reopen the case only if there
is new evidence”. Moreover, as the Mirror
has mentioned, a case review has been carried out by the authorities in
Portugal. A team working in the city of Porto has not yet concluded its
investigations.
But all of this gets lost in the frothing and ranting
directed at those rotten foreigners, without whom the search would continue,
Madeleine would be found, and all would be well. Every time hacks from British
tabloids get on their case, it is not hard to understand that the Portuguese
authorities get heartily sick of all their prodding. While they too want a
happy ending, they do not possess a magic wand.
It’s so much easier
when your only interest is selling a few more papers.
[UPDATE 20 May 1640 hours: And today we learn that the supposed bombshell is just an old one re-heated. Although the Express talks of a couple perhaps visiting the McCanns' apartment the night before the abduction, their account is notable only for its contradiction of the Mail's insistence that the Police forces in the UK and Portugal are not co-operating.
The more concrete and focused assertion comes from the Mail, and it is the old one about a group of cleaners in a white van. But this was aired in the Sun two months ago, and in the Mail later the same day. One might have expected someone at Northcliffe House to check first. And the white van story has its genesis in reports three years ago.
One fortunate aspect of all this for the McCanns is that it is the Metropolitan Police and the PJ who are dealing with the investigation - not the self-appointed Sherlocks of the press]
[UPDATE 20 May 1640 hours: And today we learn that the supposed bombshell is just an old one re-heated. Although the Express talks of a couple perhaps visiting the McCanns' apartment the night before the abduction, their account is notable only for its contradiction of the Mail's insistence that the Police forces in the UK and Portugal are not co-operating.
The more concrete and focused assertion comes from the Mail, and it is the old one about a group of cleaners in a white van. But this was aired in the Sun two months ago, and in the Mail later the same day. One might have expected someone at Northcliffe House to check first. And the white van story has its genesis in reports three years ago.
One fortunate aspect of all this for the McCanns is that it is the Metropolitan Police and the PJ who are dealing with the investigation - not the self-appointed Sherlocks of the press]
Who are these "suspects"? Holiday-makers? Temporary workers? Many are probably not now in the jurisdiction of the Portuguese police.
ReplyDelete