After all the ruckus over Parliamentary expenses, I thought
the whole list of allowable extras had been pored over by the Fourth Estate,
but one little item slipped through: the ability of MPs to claim for foreign
language lessons. And we’re not just talking brushing up the French, German and
Spanish here: the
latest two troughers caught by the tabs are doing Hebrew and Mandarin.
That seat's a bit cold, Jeremy ... Jeremy?!?
And the latter is, to no surprise at all, Jeremy Hunt the
Culture Secretary, who, in a stunt of significant cupidity (geddit?!?) has been discovered to have
claimed well north of 3,000 notes so he can communicate more effectively with
his new wife Lucia, despite having been married to her for three years already.
Oh, and he reckons it helped him talk to the Chinese PM. Yeah, right.
That isn’t all, as the Mirror
found out: now Nick Boles, another Tory MP, has been found to have claimed almost
£680 to learn Hebrew, as his partner is from Israel (strangely, I never had a
problem communicating with anyone in Israel, and apart from being able to
identify the sign on the label that says the product concerned is kosher, I don’t
have any facility in the language).
However, the Mirror
at least didn’t take the
gay-bashing route of the Daily Mail,
which stressed that Boles’ partner was his “boyfriend”,
before asserting that the Grantham and Stamford MP “is believed to be in David Cameron’s inner circle”, a level of
subtlety that might test the oo-er ability of even Graham Norton. MPs who do
not do traditional marriage are not the Mail’s
Kind Of People.
Maybe the Mail is
otherwise generous to gays? Well, no it isn’t: when
they first went after Hunt last year – by lifting
a piece from the Mirror and
adding a few bits of their own to satisfy the dictates of the Vagina Monologue –
they also couldn’t resist having a go at Lib Dem Mark Oaten, who is not only
gay, but is also a Lib Dem, therefore meaning he is, to the Dacre press,
totally beyond the pale.
And the latest revelations have put Zelo Street very temporarily
on the same side as the appallingly humourless Matthew Sinclair, director of
the so-called Taxpayers’ Alliance, who takes a dim view of a Government
minister charging taxpayers so that he can converse more effectively with his
father in law. For most of us, this kind of request at work would be laughed
out of court.
The amounts may not be as great as the sums Young Dave
claimed for his mortgage interest payments, but neither Hunt nor Boles are in
the poor house: both would do their image a whole lot of good by volunteering
to pay the money back. Or of course they could explain to their respective
constituency associations, and electorates, why they should enjoy a perk the
rest of us can’t.
So how about it, guys? You
know, before the press comes calling again?
No comments:
Post a Comment