Yesterday, the cheaper end of the Fourth Estate was
incandescent with rage about the naked photos of Prince Harry – not that he was
starkers, although as
I pointed out, the righteous mood among the pundits at the Daily Mail tried to spin it that way –
but that, while TMZ could go right ahead and publish, Clarence House had had
one of those quiet Gentlemen’s words and put the kibosh on publication in the
UK.
Oh look out, Sun reporter in bushes ...
By last night it had all become too much for Rupe’s
downmarket troops at the Super Soaraway Currant Bun, and the paper declared
that it would publish and be damned. The
result is hardly new news, because anyone who wanted to had already seen
the blurry images either on TMZ, or any of the other sites that ran them later.
So the question has to be asked as to why they did it.
The official line is that there is a public interest angle,
to which I call bullshit. This is, partly at least, a demonstration that the
tabloids can do as they please, as Brian Cathcart has
pointed out in a characteristically forthright post on the Inforrm Blog. The PCC code of conduct,
as he notes, does not allow what the Sun
has done, and dredging up Edward VIII in justification is the lamest of
excuses.
But there is a hypocrisy about this that goes beyond mere
prurience, and that is over the Leveson Inquiry. When TMZ first published, the
knee jerk reaction to the lack of UK coverage in some quarters was to assert
that Leveson had sent a chill over the land such that all those crusading
investigative warriors of the press were no longer able to expose wrongdoing,
or at least Harry’s genitals.
Only later was it revealed that there had been a request not
to publish from the Royal Family, as there had been over Harry’s presence in
Afghanistan. Those who scrabble around the dunghill that is Grubstreet didn’t
have so much of a problem acceding to that one, did they? There was no
why-oh-why-fest from the appalling Amanda Platell over that. Keeping schtum
over Afghanistan was OK.
And, quite apart from the double standards over their
response to the Royal Family, the Fourth Estate has now demonstrated, as if
proof were needed, that Leveson has not cowed the hacks and editors one jot. If
there was one session at the Last Chance Saloon for them to show that
self-regulation works, it was over this story. And the Sun spectacularly blew it – just to flog a few more copies.
As Evan Harris has
put it at Hacked Off, the Sun’s actions are “flagrant proof that our national newspapers are incapable of regulating
their own affairs”. Far
from any idea that Leveson is some kind of irrelevance, or that it is
enfeebling the press, the action of the Murdoch attack dogs demonstrates that
self regulation does not work, that the Fourth Estate pleases itself what rules
it obeys, and moving papers is everything.
The Sun has rolled hypocrisy and own goal into one. The prosecution rests.
I suppose the sensible thing for the palace or whoever to have said would be '27 year old unattached man is looking for sex on holiday. Do bears shit in the woods? Grow up journalists.'
ReplyDelete