Lots of gossip from her contacts ...
Sadly, as the increasingly desperate and downmarket Telegraph concedes, “Some of these [talking heads] are usual-suspect rent-a-gobs”. Like former Brexit Party Oberscheissenführer Nigel “Thirsty” Farage, who had no part in the Tory party infighting, or indeed any of the Brexit negotiations.
So there was no point in her wasting her time with him. The Guardian, at least, hints at the real problem for Ms Kuenssberg, after noting “It offers a portrait of baffled officials, from ministers to civil servants, splashing around in the muck, out of their depth, sometimes pointing a finger at somebody else”. As usual, when the Tories foul up, it’s someone else’s fault. There is more.
... but nothing about his lying ...
We do get “Kuenssberg suggests that this is the moment a ‘new, radical ugliness began to emerge’ in British politics”. Maybe one day we will also get her part in that: not calling out Vote Leave for breaking electoral law, and not saying boo about the constant lying from the likes of Matthew Elliott, and former chief Downing Street polecat Dominic Cummings.
Then the Guardian tells “The programme is sprawling, yet it feels as though people are missing: the biggest characters in this carousel of chaos do not appear, and their absence is notable”. Who might that include? Well, anyone from the EU side, from where the pressures came that helped to sink Ms May. No Michel Barnier. No Ursula von der Leyen. No Guy Verhofstadt.
... maybe he would like to comment?
Alexander Clarkson of KCL certainly noticed. “There is something epically absurd in a BBC documentary claiming to tell the story of the impact of the UK leaving the EU on the British political system that manages to not talk to anyone from the EU side including Ireland, nor anyone in Scottish, NI or Welsh politics”. Point, given Scotland voted overwhelmingly to Remain.
There was more: “not a single EU or Irish, Northern Irish or Scottish leader setting out all the factors external to Westminster that constrained May's freedom of action within it … As long as the story of Brexit is presented on the BBC and other key media as merely a matter of Westminster politicians negotiating with other Westminster politicians then the UK state and party system will keep making the same mistakes over and over again”. Quite.
As Patrick Howse put it in a Byline Times article, “What they got [Ms Kuenssberg] was a journalist with access to the upper reaches of the Government, with a determination to get on air and tell everyone the whispers that she had heard from ministers, advisors and officials - before Sky or ITN [but] What the BBC needed was someone who could take a step back, away from the scrum, and tell audiences when they were being lied to. That was something neither the BBC nor Kuenssberg has ever come to terms with”.
Flawed former political editor makes flawed TV series. No surprise there.
https://www.patreon.com/Timfenton
Lest we forget, this is the reality of Kuentssberg:
ReplyDeletehttps://theswamp.media/laura-kuenssberg.
The woman is far right tory media corruption writ large. A thoroughly disgusting individual, even by tory media "standards".
Link does not work.
DeleteYep Kuenssberg is nothing more than a partisan parrot for the extreme Tory right wing, pretty much all of them these days, quite happy to report porkies as facts. Defund and disband the BBC right now.
ReplyDeleteI agree with your opinion of Ms Kuenssberg's failings, but it would be so much better if you could lay off the misogynistic abuse.
ReplyDeleteI must admit, I didn't see any misogyny here Peter, just a critique of one person not doing her job well.
ReplyDeleteHouse, I think, is right. LK does seem to be more of a gossip columnist than a heavyweight journalist. That said, the whole "what larks!" approach to reporting is prevalent across the media, and and invites further questions about the nature of news organisations and their practices and structures.
ReplyDelete