I assembled what remained of my credibility, took careful aim ... and shat all over it
Jezza has used his latest Sun column to tell anyone not yet asleep that “WE all know in our heart of hearts that Harold Markle is a slightly dim but fun-loving chin who flew Apache helicopter gunships in Afghanistan and cavorted around Las Vegas hotel rooms with naked hookers. But then along came Meghan, who obviously used some vivid bedroom promises to turn him into a warrior of woke”. He means Harry. Whose name is not Harold.
Sadly, there is more. “And now it seems that she has her arm so far up his bottom, she can use her fingers to alter his facial expressions. I actually feel rather sorry for him because today he’s just a glove puppet with no more control over what he says or does than Basil Brush”. Laugh? I thought I’d never start. But then he goes full sick obsessive misogyny. And hatred.
“Meghan, though, is a different story. I hate her. Not like I hate Nicola Sturgeon or Rose West. I hate her on a cellular level”. In case you missed that, he says Megs is worse than a mass murderer. “At night, I’m unable to sleep as I lie there, grinding my teeth and dreaming of the day when she is made to parade naked through the streets of every town in Britain while the crowds chant ‘Shame!’ and throw lumps of excrement at her”.
Jeremy who?
But that is not the whole story. Jezza’s rant was published after he had broken bread with the Queen Consort earlier in the week. We know this as the Mail’s Richard Eden, another of the bottom-feeding creeps whose sole status is their alleged Royal “expertise”, penned a gushing article on a lunch to which Camilla and a raft of C-Listers were invited last Wednesday.
“Camilla's VERY glamorous private party: Dame Judi Dench, Piers Morgan, Claudia Winkleman and Jeremy Clarkson join Queen Consort at star-studded Mayfair lunch as she proves Meghan isn't the only royal with pulling power” tells the headline, claiming an “exclusive”, perhaps because no other paper was bothered with a gathering of mainly minor Slebs. There was more.
“The glitzy event at the Michelin-starred restaurant, owned by Angela Hartnett, was hosted by Ewan Venters, the former head of royal grocer Fortnum & Mason … The event came just hours before Harry and Meghan's second instalment of their Netflix docu-series - which saw the Duchess of Sussex boast of a text from BeyoncĂ© as the megastar offered her support”.
Look readers, it's trending!
Moreover, Clarkson and the Sun’s editorial staff have, by allowing this vile screed to see the light of day, underscored everything that Megs has said about the hatred emanating from our free and fearless press. Anyone who doubted the honesty and accuracy of her words will have been put straight by Jezza and his editors. The opposition has come running to her rescue.
Now watch to see who fails to condemn that column. That will prove yet more informative as to who is cool with creepy, obsessive misogyny. Sad but true.
https://www.patreon.com/Timfenton
Clarkson's act got tired years ago. This latest episode is just a pathetic attempt at being 'edgy' on a par with a washed up comedian who isn't relevant any more.
ReplyDeleteHe's well past his sell by date and hopefully those who still employ him take a look at this vile rubbish and consider their position.
Doubt it'll make a jot of difference though, his disciples will no doubt lap it up.
Presumably part of the reasoning behind Clarko"s latest excrement-fuelled missive directed at Hezza and Megs is that he thinks family members shouldn't criticise each other in public. This makes his daughter Emily's response to her father's deranged attack so apt. (she "stands against everything my dad wrote") that was reported in the Mail online who seem to be wanting to criticise Clarkson senior whilst also devoting just as much barely disguised hate towards HnM as the Wapping great big scab Sun. Witness desperate Dan Wootton.... In the 1830s utopian socialist Robert Owen wrote of how he had regular chats with the ghost of the Duke of Kent (Queen Victoria's father who had died in 1820) It would appear desperate Dan has a similar ability to commune with the dead as he tells the Mail's readers (who depressingly seem to agree with him) that the late Princess Di would be ashamed of Harry. How does he know this? He after all does attack Harry for spouting conspiracy theories - "without a scintilla of evidence" - about collusion between royal employees and the media. Even Clarkson didn't stoop to the level of trying to turn Harry's dead mother against him, that really is in a class of its own....
ReplyDeleteClarkson is genuinely amusing when talking about cars and making schoolboyish jokes. But when he expresses opinions on anything serious he implodes instantly. But his level of knowledge (none) is only slightly beneath our journalist class.
ReplyDeleteOne of his daughters has apparently given him a verbal shoeing over this on Instagram.
ReplyDeleteToday the fourth estate is reporting that Clarkson is allegedly 'horrified' by the backlash his bigotry has provoked.
ReplyDeleteC listers? You give them too much there. Z listers morelike
ReplyDeleteNow Do Prince Andrew, UK Tabloids Asked
ReplyDeleteHe was vaguely amusing years ago but stopped being so even before his hissy fit for wshich the BBC quite correctly booted him out.
ReplyDelete