No smirking matter this time
It is a subject to which the increasingly desperate and downmarket Telegraph has returned today, claiming “UK sources claim the European Commission is ‘turning a blind eye to people dying’ by refusing to send migrants who have crossed the channel back to France”. Doesn’t make sense, anonymous sources, but timing is all.
It’s unlikely to be mere coincidence that such evidence-free drivel is published at the same time that Priti Patel, the Benidorm holiday rep Home Secretary, is under fire for allegedly being extremely economical with the Actualité, after she claimed that she was in “active discussions with EU member states on bilateral agreements”.
She specifically mentioned the Netherlands, Belgium, Germany and France. But, as the FT has reported, Germany has kept schtum, Belgium said there were no talks taking place, and the other two countries’ representatives claimed this was an issue to be discussed at an EU-wide level. Ms Patel’s department now claims she was misquoted.
The problem she has is that the impression is given that she has made something up without knowing her subject - like not appreciating that this is an issue likely to be dealt with at an EU-wide level, not by individual member states. Perhaps the constant background noise generated by the likes of former Brexit Party Oberscheissenführer Nigel “Thirsty” Farage makes her feel that she has to appear to be doing something.
Her problem is, though, that when the UK left the EU at the end of last year, it also left the Dublin Accords. This removed the means to return some irregular migrants: the Guardian warned last year “EU negotiators have rejected a British request for a migration pact that would allow the government to return asylum seekers to other European countries”.
Small wonder that the Commons Home Affairs Committee, chaired by the tenacious Yvette Cooper, wants answers. Priti Patel gives every impression of having done next to nothing on the issue of irregular migration. The dishonest intervention of Government mouthpieces like the Telegraph only reinforces that impression, as does the lack of understanding on issues where member states work independently - and where they do not.
Our Home Secretary does not appear to be up to the job. So no change there, then.
https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/zelostreet9
A Benidorm rep would do a much better job. They are used to dealing with all types of individuals a fair manner
ReplyDeleteGill
it was the UK that triggered Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty, it was the UK that decided not to remain in the Single Market or Customs Union, and it was the UK that declined to extend the post-Brexit transition period. It is not someone else’s doing.
ReplyDeleteMore accurately it was England. Scotland and N Ireland voted Remain, as Wales would have done but for English migrants (Sorry. I meant expats)
So the poison dwarf Ugli Patel lied.
ReplyDeleteYet sgain.
So capitalist state media outlet(s) goose-stepped in to spread the evil propaganda.
Yet again.
Britain 2021, a nation slowly poisoning itself over 40 years. Governed by a thoroughly corrupt one party Parliament in the most corrupt city in Europe.
It's what people voted for. So suck it up, Britain. God knows you've got it coming.
Trouble is, the UK is having so much trouble implementing the Withdrawal Agreement, and in particular, the Northern Ireland Protocol. I can well understand that the EU member states and commission do not want to overload the UK government with even more responsibilities and commitments.
ReplyDeleteI recommend that the British government put more effort into fulfilling its existing agreements, before complicating matters further.