The now-defunct Screws
once referred to low-security Hollesley Bay jail in Suffolk as a “holiday camp”. Now that one of its less
than illustrious former editors has done a stretch there, it would be
interesting to know if the modern-day Sun
on Sunday is still of that opinion. It would be yet more interesting to know
what Rupe’s downmarket troops think of his early release.
While much press
coverage was devoted to Andy Coulson’s incarceration in Belmarsh Prison,
telling that he should not be banged up with all those proper criminals, and
then have to share a cell with Neville “stylish
masturbator” Thurlbeck, they all went quiet when he was transferred to a
place which had been the target of so much tabloid scorn in previous years.
And what none of the Fourth Estate is complaining about
right now is that the man who Young Dave allowed into Downing Street, but who
had been pivotal to the industrial-scale phone hacking at the Screws, is going to be released well
before the half-way point in his eighteen-month sentence, even when there is
his looming trial on perjury charges in Scotland to consider.
The Telegraph went
with the simple and prosaic: “Andy
Coulson to be freed from jail on electronic tag ... Former Downing Street
communications chief and editor of the News of the World will be released after
serving 20 weeks of an 18 month sentence”. No shock horror at the leniency, then? Nine months would have been
halfway through the sentence, remember.
How has the ever
watchful and judgmental Daily Mail
reported the news? “Andy Coulson
out of prison on Friday: Disgraced former News of the World editor will wear
electronic tag after serving less than five months of 18-month sentence”
they tell, which at least confirms
how little of the sentence he will serve. And they mention the “holiday camp” jibe, as
does the HuffPost UK.
What the Mail also
does, though, is to explain why Coulson is getting out after less than five
months: “His sentence has been calculated
under a complicated set of rules known as the Home Detention Curfew Scheme. This
allows non-violent inmates sentenced to 18 months or more to spend the last 135
days or less at home, wearing a tag”. Shame that it takes a former editor
being jailed to tell readers that.
But the Mail does not accompany its coverage
with a judgmental editorial telling readers how soft the prison system has
become, and nor will any of its pundits be condemning Coulson’s early release
any time soon – certainly not the likes of Richard Littlejohn. What a change
from politicians like Jeffrey Archer getting banged up in the same prison.
Anyone would think
there was a different set of rules for journalists. Once more.
No comments:
Post a Comment