While the Telegraph
titles continue to haemorrhage hacks at an alarming rate – well, alarming for
those still clinging on to their seats within the Victoria bunker – one Sunday fixture
remains constant. Yes, serial fraud Christopher Booker churns out the dubiously
sourced garbage on cue, every week. Every week he tries to slip in more of
those whoppers. And every week he gets caught out.
Decades of service. And of getting it wrong
Today’s
diatribe, “Millions for the Met
Office to carry on getting it wrong”, is no exception. Here, the great man
brings his superior insights to bear on the subjects of weather forecasting and
climate change, where he stands alone as the one who is telling the right tale,
fighting against the dastardly Met Office and all those scientists, who cannot
possibly hope to match his level of awareness.
“In 2007, its computer
predicted that this would be the ‘warmest year ever’, just before global
temperatures temporarily plummeted by 0.7C, equal to their entire net rise in
the 20th century” he tells. Global temperatures in 2007 actually rose
slightly; the following year they fell, but by little more than 0.1C. Still,
the odd transcription error, and all that. And, as the man said, there’s more.
“From 2008 to 2010 the
models consistently predicted ‘warmer than average’ winters and ‘hotter and
drier summers’: three years when much of the northern hemisphere endured record
winter cold and snow”. Wrong. No absolute predictions were made. Saying
there is a greater chance of one weather outcome over another is something
different entirely. And there was no “record
winter cold and snow”.
The coldest recent spell – December 2010 – was not part of a
record coldest winter. That winter did not come close to 1978/9, which in turn
was not as severe as 1962/3 or 1946/7. But have another go: “temperatures have now not risen for 18
years, and not one has got near 1998’s record as the ‘hottest ever’”. So
how does he explain 2005, 2007, and 2010, which were all warmer?
Booker then segues effortlessly into energy policy: “those same computer models are the basis ...
for Britain’s crazy national energy policy” he asserts. But there will be
enough in reserve to stop the light going out: “enough is already in place to
give it a ‘hidden reserve’ of another 7GW, equivalent to four large nuclear
reactors”. The largest single reactor in the UK is Sizewell B – 1.2GW.
Sums clearly do not come easily to Booker. But he does know
that, by 2030, “we will have shut down
all our gas and coal-fired power stations”. That would be news to all those
planning and building new gas-fired ones. The thought enters that Booker is
recycling so much discredited rubbish that the Tel may have secured his services on the cheap – hence his remaining
when so many others have been binned.
The level of accuracy is at least consistent – rather too low to be credible.
Booker becomes a cropper as not knowing his (green) onions?
ReplyDelete