The Mail On Sunday
and Sunday Express are
singing from the same hymn sheet this morning. “Two Years’ Jail For Vile Trolls”
thunders the Express, while the Mail concurs: “Web Trolls To Get Two Years In
Jail”, going on to tell of “Cyber-mobs
poisoning Britain”. But, as Captain Blackadder might have observed, there
was only one thing wrong with this idea: it was bollocks.
Trolling is A Very Bad Thing!
While the Mail
rants “Internet trolls who subject
victims to vile abuse are to be jailed for up to two years under a tough
Government crackdown. Harsher
sentences are to be introduced following a series of shocking, high-profile
cases, including rape threats made against model Chloe Madeley last week”,
it seems that someone is having a bout of double standards here.
One only has to see the comments of Chris Grayling, the
non-lawyer who has somehow been handed the post of Justice Secretary, to see
that the press is being singularly disingenuous: “These internet trolls are cowards who are poisoning our national
life. No one would permit such venom in person, so there should be no place for
it on social media”. Really? Do go on.
Yes, trolling is really, really bad!
“This is a law to
combat cruelty – and marks our determination to take a stand against a baying
cyber-mob. We must send out a clear message”. So the Government wants to
end “cruelty” and the rule of the “baying mob”, those who would not dare
dispense “such venom in person”, and
who are “poisoning our national life”?
If so, it’s looking the wrong way right now.
While the cheaper end of the Fourth Estate is imploring us
to “look over there” at the
unfortunate Ms Madeley, the Mail and Express are not averse to doing a little
of that “cruelty” of the “baying mob” themselves – and stuff the
consequences. What they do in print – and then reinforce via, well, social
media, actually – does far more damage than any keyboard hero secreted away in
his bedroom ever could.
But this kind of mob cruelty is fine
Both papers were in the vanguard of presuming Christopher
Jefferies was guilty. Both indulged in disgraceful hounding of Kate and Gerry
McCann, with the Express having to
publish a front page apology. And, if we’re talking teenagers being subjected
to cruel treatment, don’t forget the
Mail’s vicious attacks on Rory
Weal for speaking
at the Labour conference, or the
creepy luring of Paris Brown.
And let us not forget the Mail’s monstering of transgender schoolteacher Lucy Meadows, which
included a cruel and insensitive (even by his low standards) attack by
the tedious and unfunny Richard Littlejohn – which
was followed by her suicide. Yet, by inference at least, the press is
telling us that these cruel and vicious attacks are fine – so long as they are
the ones doing them.
Shame on Chris Grayling – legislating at the behest of the press, for their benefit.
Will we still be able to troll IS?
ReplyDeleteY'know, I suspect nobody will object to that.
ReplyDeleteI fear for Louise Mensch.
ReplyDeleteTim Fenton said...
ReplyDelete'Y'know, I suspect nobody will object to that.'
Just as I thought, there will be those who will be protected by any new law and those who are not considered to be worthy of protection. There is clearly trolling and there is trolling.
All we need now is a clear definition of what counts as trolling, proper communication of that definition and a population bright enough to understand it. In the meantime expect the police to be run off their feet by people who can't cope with others who simply disagree.
ReplyDelete