Showing that press deadlines can leave the papers looking
flat-footed, and at the same time chucking a grenade of unspecified explosive
power into the already steaming cauldron that is the Scottish independence
debate, has come a superbly-timed leak from someone modestly called “an NHS whistleblower” to put the boot
into Alex Salmond and his fellow nationalists.
Yes, while the Murdoch Times
was obeying His Master’s Voice and telling readers “Unionists outgunned in final push for Scotland” (Rupe may, of
course, change tack and embarrass his supposedly upmarket troops even more in
the next couple of days), news had reached the Herald – and the BBC – that the NHS in Scotland was
facing a £400 million funding shortfall.
And that is likely to get the Yes campaign and its
supporters even more annoyed: they were already gunning for the Beeb after
political editor Nick Robinson asked Salmond a question (in other words, he was
doing his job) and the First Minister decided to cut up rough over it. Now the
Corporation has information that reflects badly on the current Scottish
Government – that would be them.
The BBC report will make grim reading for the Yes camp: “The documents state: ‘The status quo and
preservation of existing models of care are no longer an option given the
pressing challenges we face’. The whistleblower has alleged that pressures on
the NHS come from Scottish government policies”. That is in direct conflict
with the assertion that the UK Government was the biggest threat.
There was more: “The
documents suggest that health boards will have to consider centralising
hospitals and closing services - a measure which the SNP vowed to stop when it
was elected in 2007. The Scottish government reversed the closure of Accident
and Emergency departments at Monklands and Ayr hospitals, but the papers
suggest such dramatic measures may be back on the table”.
And there was this conclusion: “Services are unsustainable right across Scotland from three emergency
centres in Lanarkshire, to emergency care at the Vale (of Leven) to paediatrics
at St John's (in Livingston), and with particular issues for more rural boards
hence the problems at Grampian. The current pattern of services is underpinned
but short-term money and fixes won't stack up going into next year”.
Scotland’s Health Secretary Alex Neil made a positive
counter to the news, but, tellingly, did not dispute the shortfall figure. As
in the rest of the UK, and despite the best efforts of the right-wing press,
whenever an NHS issue is thrown into an election campaign, it can spell trouble
for one of the parties, and that party is usually that of the incumbent
Government. That means it’s trouble for Salmond.
As another Scot might have put it, it’s squeaky bum time for the Yes campaign.
"Rupe may, of course, change tack and embarrass his supposedly upmarket troops even more in the next couple of days"
ReplyDeleteStill waiting for the La Mensch's verdict is he? Downmarket is where it's at!