The libertarian right’s susceptibility to being misled, and
in turn eagerly misleading others, has been highlighted by the issue of plain
packaging for cigarettes, as some of their number have leapt to jump on the “it’s not working” bandwagon set running
by the Murdoch press, rather than bother themselves with all the facts. Typical
of these has been the Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA).
Mark Littlewood
In late June, under
the headline “Evidence is not on the
side of plain packaging”, Mark Littlewood, the grandly-titled Director
General of the IEA, told that “With
tobacco sales rising after plain packaging was introduced in Australia, the
public health case for this policy looks increasingly weak”. But tobacco
sales to smokers in Australia are falling
– even
the industry admits that.
He went on “The British
government said that it was ‘minded’ to introduce plain packaging on the basis
of a deliriously optimistic review of the theoretical evidence, but it can only
seriously consider proceeding if it undertakes serious reviews of the impact on
intellectual property, counterfeiting, smuggling, tax evasion and trade
disputes. These are the pressing issues that have so far been ignored”.
Not only is this needlessly hyperbolic – “deliriously optimistic” also includes a
blatantly false assumption – but also assumes that, for instance, forbidding
brands from being packaged with old-established ad-man’s symbols and straplines
can be given a value, classed as “intellectual
property”, and made the subject of reparation claims. It also repeats the
evidence-free “counterfeiting and
smuggling” claim.
What he doesn't want to see in the UK
But what Littlewood and the IEA are also not telling is
that, quite apart from his routine dishonesty, his organisation has good reason
to shill for the tobacco industry: they are funding him. When Littlewood
asserts that plain packaging is “the
latest ludicrous move in the unending, ceaseless, bullying war against those
who choose to produce and consume tobacco”, he is not doing it out of
altruism.
Because, as
George Monbiot at the deeply subversive Guardian
has told, “British American Tobacco,
Philip Morris and Japan Tobacco International have been funding the
institute – in BAT's case since 1963. British American Tobacco has
admitted that it gave the institute £20,000 last year and that it's ‘planning
to increase our contribution in 2013 and 2014’”. Well, well.
And, as Monbiot notes, “whether
companies pay for specific publications or whether they continue to fund a body
that – by the purest serendipity – publishes books and pamphlets that concur
with the desires of its sponsors, surely makes no difference”. Quite.
Littlewood and the IEA are in Big Tobacco’s pocket. Far from being a “non-partisan” think-tank, this is yet another
grubby sell-out.
Mark Littlewood, liar, hypocrite, sell-out, but still a respected
pundit. For now.
When discussing anything to do with the Institute of economic Affairs no opportunity should ever be missed to remind people that it was co-founded by a right-wing extremist who almost certainly got away with murder.
ReplyDeleteSee this Adam Curtis post for the full story:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/blogadamcurtis/posts/the_curse_of_tina