So the result has been announced and the spinning has
started: the Tories held
on to Newark-on-Trent in yesterday’s by-election, with Robert Jenrick (a
most deserving recipient of the nickname “Robert
Generic”) securing a majority of over 7,000. This was down from the 16,000
garnered by Patrick Mercer in 2010, but more
than enough to see off Roger Helmer of UKIP.
Squeaky failure finger up the bum time
Armed with this victorious result, the Rt Hon Gideon George
Oliver Osborne, heir to the seventeenth Baronet, went on the Radio 4 Today programme and generated a
straight-A f*** off moment of jaw-dropping brass neck when
he asserted this was “disastrous”
for Labour, as the party had won the seat in 1997. That was when there was no
significant UKIP vote, and there was one other minor difference.
The constituency boundaries have been changed since Tone’s
landslide finally ended the years of “Shagger”
Major: in the north, the town of Retford, which votes strongly Labour, has been
moved to the adjacent seat of Bassetlaw, and to compensate for this loss, the
area around Bingham, to the south of Newark, was brought in. Hence the Tories
winning the seat in 2001, and retaining it since then.
The idea that Labour should have won, despite UKIP enjoying
a high profile in the wake of elections to the European Parliament (EP), is
bunk. But it shows that the Tories are now looking to next year’s General
Election and therefore slinging as much mud at Mil The Younger and his team as
they can muster, knowing that Nigel “Thirsty”
Farage and his fellow saloon bar propper-uppers will fare less well then.
What Osborne, new MP Jenrick, and party chairman Grant “Spiv” Shapps will not want to talk about
is that their vote declined by almost twice the percentage loss experienced by
Labour, despite the flooding of the constituency by all those bright-eyed and
bushy-tailed activists, something which will not be happening anywhere in the
UK next June. Nor does UKIP have anything to crow about.
George Eaton at
the Staggers observed “Labour MPs who visited the constituency told
me that they encountered a significant number of traditional centre-left
supporters who held their noses and voted Conservative on the grounds that it
was the best means of stopping Farage's party. One voter compared it to backing
Jacques Chirac against Jean-Marie Le Pen in the 2002 French presidential
election”.
Moreover, support for UKIP among women voters was estimated
by one pollster to be as low as 17%. The party’s campaign will not have been
helped by selecting the antediluvian Helmer as its figurehead – nor by Farage
being absent on a jolly in Malta while his foot soldiers were trudging the
streets of the constituency. The upshot is that UKIP is still to experience its
Orpington moment.
We may have witnessed the high water mark of the Kippers. Good thing too.
No it wasn't an Orpington moment for UKIP but it wasn't exactly a disaster for them either. Nige may have done a bit better than Helmer but he had more sense than to stand in what was always an unwinnable seat for them. There's still the small but significant chance of a win for Farage next May if he chooses his target carefully and that really does worry me
ReplyDeleteBy the look of Nigel Farage (in a very short interview that, remarkably, was not played back ad nauseum by the BBC) he hasn't found the scrutiny of the last few days very pleasant. If I were him, I'd be wondering if it was really worth it at this point - he's had a fairly easy ride so far but the pressures of being a party leader don't seem to sit very easily with him. Being out of the country on the last day of the campaign because he had a prior engagement, and not going to Newark on the Sunday before the vote because he was 'offered national television' doesn't really suggest someone who is all that keen on the reality of political leadership. Maybe he will feel more enthusiastic when the dust settles after his mauling by the press but I wonder how he'd cope if they really got their teeth into him.
ReplyDeleteBit dodgy comparing the ups and downs since 2010, there was a massive drop in turnout. Very hard to say what exactly the true feeling are but large turnouts tend to favour the mainstream, small turnouts the more "specialist" and highly motivated.
ReplyDelete