RUPERT MURDOCH –
YOU’RE NICKED
Remember the indifference of most of the Fourth Estate to
the Guardian’s revelations back in
2009? Most of their efforts were directed to slagging off the BBC for having
the temerity to mention the story. We now know, several thousands of voicemail
interceptions and one hacking trial later, that, far from being a “non-story”, it was one of the most
serious abuses of media power ever seen.
So one might have thought all those papers would be
listening up when the same journalist who brought phone hacking into the open –
Nick
Davies – reported that “Rupert
Murdoch has been officially informed by Scotland Yard that detectives want to
interview him as a suspect as part of their inquiry into allegations of crime
at his British newspapers”. He’s flying in today.
Yet the only mention of the Murdoch empire’s less than
sparkling conduct is the front page of its own Times – no longer able to call itself a paper of record – trying to
diminish the hacking trial by complaining about its cost, most
of which was the hiring of a significantly-sized defence team by, er, the
Murdoch empire. Yes, the Times is
complaining about the largesse of its owners.
But does a pre-arranged interview with the Met really
matter? Well, yes it does, as the
Daily Beast has pointed out. “Scotland Yard is investigating corporate charges against the company”
[my emphasis] ... after that, Jay
Rockefeller, chairman of the Senate Committee on Commerce, says he is
waiting to formally launch a congressional investigation into the company”.
The Met has previously intimated its readiness to pursue
News UK, as it is now known following Rupe’s move to split his newspaper
interests from his vastly more profitable broadcast media business, the company’s
reaction being “a successful corporate
prosecution ‘would be apocalyptic’ and threaten to ‘kill’ the corporation in
both Britain and the U.S., costing tens of thousands of jobs”.
Yes, don’t come for us, or the ordinary hardworking people
to whom we pay comparatively little will get it. It’s a strategy with very
limited horizons: now that Andy Coulson has been found guilty, and several of
his former colleagues have already confessed, it’s not going to hold back the tide
of investigation much longer. A corporate prosecution Stateside will force the
Met’s hand, whatever the defence.
And it will happen even if the press bands together and
hopes it will all go away. While the Fourth Estate’s useful idiots sneered at the Guardian back in 2009, I said it was serious
(you can read my analysis HERE, HERE, HERE
and HERE). Now it is yet more serious. And
it has the potential to draw other newspapers, plus their owners, into the
mire. Rupe getting interviewed today opens
a whole new chapter.
Brand Murdoch may well be seen as weakened but that didn't stop little Gove from accepting lavish hospitality at the digger's Mayfair home only recently (where Gove - with quaint, boyish charm - fessed up to getting a little 'tipsy'). I wonder what was discussed at this most agreeable soirée. It can't have been Gove's Vera Lynn CD collection, surely?
ReplyDeleteMaybe Brand Murdoch isn't as toxic as the DB suggests.