Turning up with all the gaiety of a wet fart in a lift, Liam
Fox was somehow allowed on to The Andy
Marr Show (tm) this morning to
tell anyone still interested in his view that there should be more
surveillance because of what may be happening in the Middle East. He also
suggested that it would be good fun to strip a few people of their citizenship,
perhaps pour encourager les autres.
It was probably buggins’ turn, and Fox was judged to be as
senior a party figure as Labour’s Chuka Umunna, who was there to defend Mil The
Younger against the latest wave of faux outrage, which in turn had been
precipitated by the last wave doing nothing to Labour’s poll lead. But the
ability of someone so comprehensively discredited to worm his way onto the
airwaves is disquieting.
Why this should be may have been forgotten by some, so perhaps
a little memory-jogging is in order. For Fox and the Tory right, the rot set in
during September 2010, when a
number of leaks were made by someone
in the Ministry of Defence (MoD) to the Maily
Telegraph. The
culprit, let us not drive this one around the houses for too long, was Fox.
And Young Dave should
have sacked him there and then.
Sadly, it
was only with the discovery of Fox’s arrangements
with “close friend” Adam Werritty
a year later that Cameron finally sacked the SOB (the subsequent inability of
most of the press to acknowledge the Guardian
as being the title that did for Fox was an
interesting side-show). All of that was reason enough not to trust Fox any
further than he could be chucked. But then came his “charity”.
The quote marks are because, as Jamie Doward at the Observer pointed out, “Officially it was a charity; in fact, Fox's
thinktank was a meeting place for the movers and shakers of the right wing”.
Atlantic Bridge, according to Fox, was all about “a network of individual people who can know one another”. Those
people were, generally, impeccably right-leaning.
Doward noted that Atlantic Bridge’s website had been taken
down, “But old caches of the site reveal
that, while shadow ministers, George Osborne, Michael Gove, Chris
Grayling and William Hague were all on its advisory council
alongside Fox, its UK chairman. All four stood down as awkward questions over
its political activities, which contravened charity laws, resulted in the
organisation being wound up”.
So not only had Fox been a thoroughly untrustworthy member
of the cabinet, he had also been involved in breaking charity laws, and
overseeing highly irregular behaviour by his pal Werritty. Why does the Tory
Party continue to allow him to be put forward to speak for them? Downing Street
must know that he will continue to peddle his own perverse view on security
matters.
Or perhaps the Tories
are happy for someone to promote paranoia for them.
"But the ability of someone so comprehensively discredited to worm his way onto the airwaves is disquieting."
ReplyDeleteIt is indeed very disturbing. He re-launched his "charity" after the invasion of Iraq by saying to the Americans that the Tories had voted for the Americans' war so they would like some money, please.
Guano