The assault by the right-leaning part of the press, that is
to say most of it, on Mil The Younger continues today with the personal
encouragement of the legendarily foul mouthed Paul Dacre at the Daily Mail. Stepping up to the plate to
grovel appropriately before his editor is Andrew Pierce, whose devotion to the
Tory Party is so complete that he has named his Twitter handle in its honour.
What's f***ing wrong with my hacks ripping off other people's content, c***?!? Er, with the greatest of respect, Mr Jay
The appropriately-named @toryboypierce has, for his hatchet
job, chosen to kick Miliband’s media advisor Tom Baldwin, and in a style of
zero subtlety. “Red Ed's team and the
ghost of David Kelly” screams
the headline, followed by “Red Ed
Miliband and his deputy Harriet Harman have run a mile from Tony Blair’s loopy
claims that the Iraq war was justified”. So loopy that your paper backed
them.
But do go on: “The
Labour leader stresses that he wasn’t even an MP in 2003 when the war began,
and never voted for it. However,
Red Ed’s own private office can’t escape close association with one of the
darkest episodes of the Blair government’s conduct of the war: the death of
government scientist Dr David Kelly”. Ah, we’re playing another game
of “Excuse Gilligan”, aren’t we?
Indeed we are: “Tom Baldwin, now Red Ed’s senior media adviser, was the newspaper journalist
who named Kelly as the source behind the BBC story by Andrew Gilligan that the
Blair government had ‘sexed up’ a dossier about Iraq’s ‘weapons of mass
destruction’ to justify war against Saddam Hussein”. As well as saying “Red Ed” rather a lot, but then, Pierce
no doubt has his orders.
And do we have Big Al in the mix? You betcha, says Sarah: “Alastair Campbell, who advises Miliband on
election strategy and was Blair’s communications chief at the time, wrote in
his diaries that releasing Kelly’s name would ‘f*** Gilligan’”. Yes, the
old smear that assumes pulling the rug out from under Gilligan caused David
Kelly to take his own life. So let me put Pierce straight on this one.
As the deeply subversive Guardian
has
pointed out, “[Baldwin] hit the
headlines in July 2003 when he became one
of the first journalists to name David Kelly as Andrew Gilligan's source of
information about the dossier into Iraqi weapons of mass destruction” [my
emphasis]. Pierce also fails to note Gilligan’s role in having Kelly
questioned. And this story is not a new one.
So who did he lift it from? How about “Tom Baldwin’s action as a communications agent for Alastair Campbell
started a chain of events which led to the death of David Kelly” written
almost three years ago by Tim
Montgomerie – now rewarded with a Murdoch staff berth – and which extensively
quotes Simon Carr, now working in the service of the perpetually thirsty Paul
Staines at the Guido Fawkes blog.
You want derivative, badly sourced and slanted rubbish? Pierce is your man.
Re: The Blogs Complaints Commission... your concluding paragraph on this article included names that rang a bell:
ReplyDelete...written almost three years ago by Tim Montgomerie – now rewarded with a Murdoch staff berth – and which extensively quotes Simon Carr, now working in the service of the perpetually thirsty Paul Staines at the Guido Fawkes blog.
Was this the same Tim Montgomerie who appeared at Leveson?
From the BBC website:
Do we need a blog complaints commission?
r to return or tab to continue.
Bloggers have come under the spotlight at the Leveson inquiry into press standards, with questions raised over the lack of regulation in the blogosphere.
Paul Waugh, editor of politicshome.com and ConservativeHome editor Tim Montgomerie discuss how free bloggers should be to say what they like.
/end
All very incestuous, eh?