As if to show that he has grabbed hold of the wrong end of
the response to Young Dave’s affirmation
of Christianity – part looking to offload even more of the welfare burden
on the church, part trying to claw back voters unhappy about same-sex marriage –
the legendarily foul mouthed Paul Dacre has decreed that anyone opposing the
Cameron line is to be given a good kicking.
What's f***ing wrong with kicking atheists, c***?!? Er, with respect, of course, Mr Jay
So it should surprise no-one to see the Daily Mail going after those criticising the PM: “'Britain IS a Christian country - and we
respect that': Hindu, Muslim and Sikh leaders back the PM after 'militant
atheists' tell him to keep quiet on religion ... Celebrity atheists wrote open
letter criticising David Cameron for calling Britain a Christian country” thunders
the carefully crafted headline.
Those who signed
the letter to the Maily Telegraph are
dismissed as “The Celebrity Anti-God
Squad”, although the calibre of the Mail’s
spiritual talking heads has to be in doubt after they fall back on former
Archbishop of Canterbury George Carey, the rent-a-quote face of the “Christianity under attack” brigade, as a
reliable witness. And it can’t be a Christian country if Christians are being
marginalised.
But this is a minor
blip on the radar, as Dacre also
calls on the services of Stephen “Miserable
Git” Glover, who declares “This new breed of militant atheists are as
intolerant as any religious fundamentalists”. What’s “militant” about someone who has done nothing more than sign a
letter to the Telegraph? Ah, but
Polly Toynbee is somehow involved. And she’s an Obligatory Daily Mail Hate Figure.
Glover really lets rip: “furious
letter ... metropolitan liberal atheists ... astonishingly intolerant ...
divisive ... angry letter-writers ... at least some of the signatories are
zealots ... new breed of militant atheists ... unreasoning ... intolerance ...
anti-religion diehards ... unhinged ... unceasing hatred of religion ...
dishonest little letter ... atheistical zealot”. As Sir Sean nearly said, I
think we got the point.
One commenter who responded to Glover’s tirade mused “A letter to the Telegraph doesn't seem very militant to me”. This
is true, but misses the point: anyone not showing sufficient respect to
organised religion – which is what Dacre has decreed is A Good Thing – has to
be ritually smeared pour encourager les
autres. And over at the Tel,
Charles Moore has
chimed in agreement.
Moore wibbles on
about “Prof Jim Al-Khalili, who
led the signatures, derives his first name from an apostle of Jesus, as do his
co-signatories the novelist Philip Pullman and the anti-religious fanatic Peter
Tatchell, who is named, ultimately, after the first Pope”, and thus adds
sweet jack to the discussion. But this is symptomatic of the bile the right-wing
press will dump on anyone questioning reliance on religion.
Speak out of turn and Dacre will come after you. Not that he’s a bully, of course.
"anti-religious fanatic Peter Tatchell, who is named, ultimately, after the first Pope”
ReplyDeletePeter has been derived from Latin, after the Greek, meaning stone or rock. Presumably all bearing that name are "stoned"?
All Peter's off their head or suffering a beating?
Dacre's word associations get weirder. Perhaps the BBC could invent a new panel game with it rather than bringing back Brucie's old baby.
So the Dacre view is that anyone named after apostles is somehow slightly christian or possiblily indebted to christianity. This theory goes wrong in two ways. Firstly, I'm pretty certain that no-one in the biblical area and era was called Paul or Peter - these are English names (OK, Paul occurs in other european languages...) Whatever the origins of the bible it wasn't in English (or French etc.), somewhere along the line translators have linked characters to English names. But the big, big mistake for the christian campaign is that the bible basically says all these people were jewish! Even an atheist like me can remember that bit from school. So we have names linked to something that was originally jewish which therefore makes the person christian....?
ReplyDeleteAnd now you've got me started.....
Latest census figures don't seem to be out yet but will show that over two thirds of the population ticked the christian box. So that's a solid christian base according to Cameron etc.. But lock groups of the various christian sects into a large space (like a Big Brother Warehouse) and see how long it takes them to start fighting over religious differences!
And whilst the Mail and the right wing politicians have bene banging on about Polish immigrants it's their presence that is boosting the christian count.
And by emphasising the massive proportion of christians they have managed to undermine their long running story that we are being overrun by muslims!