As the succession of articles by Andrew “transcription error” Gilligan about
supposed Islamist takeovers of schools in Birmingham has continued, this
blog has suggested that he quits referring to reports of which he has “had a sight”, and actually show us the
proverbial money. And, although I’m sure Gilligan wouldn’t dirty himself with looking
in on Zelo Street, he
has now done just that.
However, and in this case there is a significantly-sized
however, Gilligan is, by his own admission, still not showing readers anything
in its entirety, as these are “selected
extracts”. And in one of the areas where he has been claiming illegality,
he has been shown to have not told readers the whole story – the subject of
gender segregation, which is a hot potato not just for Muslims.
Teaching male and female pupils separately has been
practised for many years by Roman Catholics and even some ostensibly secular
schools, especially those where there are boarders. It’s not the same as gender
segregation within the same school, or the same classroom, but the distinction
is not as great as Gilligan and his pals would like their readers to believe.
But back to the supposed plot: Gilligan has
previously talked of “the so-called ‘Trojan
Horse’ plot by extremists to ‘Islamise’ secular state education in Birmingham
which has allegedly seen the illegal
segregation of pupils” [my emphasis, note his use of quotation marks].
Also, “The report, disclosed in The
Telegraph on Friday, accused Park View,
Nansen and Golden Hillock of illegally
segregating pupils”.
And what form did this segregation entail? “Girls at Park View and Golden Hillock were
made to sit at the back of the class”. Now let’s look at what the report
Gilligan chose to reproduce actually
said (Paragraph 50).
“There was gender segregation
in some classes at Park View Academy
and Golden Hillock. Some classes
observed had boys sitting at the front of the class and girls around the edges.
There were also lessons where boys and girls sat at the same table but on
opposite sides. We also observed lessons
where boys and girls were mixed. Boys and girls are taught separately for
PE lessons, which is not unusual” [my emphases].
Perhaps someone more familiar with the legal niceties can
advise where the law is being broken here. What Gilligan has also managed not
to let readers know is that Park Hill, a school where the vast majority of
pupils are eligible for free school meals, has
a five-subject GCSE A-C pass rate of around 75%. After all, this is
supposed to be about children’s education. Isn’t it?
On top of that is the thought that, had the schools
concerned remained under the control of the local authority ... Gilligan won’t be going there.
Without wanting either to rule out or rule in the possibility that segregation is problematic in this school, it's worth noting that in my experience (as a parent) teachers may want to keep certain students under their eye at the front of the class. Boys more often seem to fall into this category.
ReplyDeleteDid you read the rest of the report you linked to at http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/files/2014/04/dfe-doc-p10.jpg ?
ReplyDeleteSpecifically, the last two sentences in paragraph 52?