For once, Nigel “Thirsty”
Farage has taken an interest in an EU member state that is not the UK. And his
thoughts are with Denmark right now, as his
latest propaganda screed for the Daily
Express (aka Daily UKIP)
showed. “Might I suggest that if you have
room you squeeze in a cinnamon danish before the EU bans them?” he asked,
because nobody is banning cinnamon any time soon.
So, if cinnamon is not being banned, what is? After all, the
Daily Mail also has this story,
offering “Is this the end of the cinnamon
roll? Traditional Danish pastries under threat after EU threatens ban on the
spice”, which is also wrong (see above). Even
the Mirror has “A proposed European Union limit on the
amount of cinnamon used in baked goods could see the end of Denmark's
traditional festive pastries”.
And from the start, the Mail
presents this as an open-and-shut case: “Brussels
has sparked outrage in Denmark by proposing to outlaw their traditional
pastries. Christmas festivities have been
dampened in Copenhagen by the prospect that this could be the last year its
citizens will be able to eat their kanelsnegler or cinnamon rolls”.
This, however, is bullshit.
We know this as Danish journalist Ole Ryborg has
set out the facts in an article for DR which you can read right HERE. There
are two types of cinnamon involved: real or Ceylon cinnamon (Cinnamomum Verum), on which there is no
restriction, and certainly no ban, and Chinese or Cassia cinnamon (Cinnamomum Cassia), quantities of which
are to be restricted in foodstuffs on sale throughout the EU.
The restriction on Cassia cinnamon is because it
contains coumarin, which has the potential to cause liver damage. Some hacks
and politicians say that consumers would have to take in such large quantities
that this would not be possible, but that assumes that the only exposure to
coumarin and other liver-damaging substances are through eating Kanelsneglen,
or Cinnamon Snails.
Those are the “traditional
pastries” the Mail is banging on
about. Many bakeries in Denmark are using Cassia cinnamon in those pastries as
it is cheaper, but they have a straightforward alternative: use the real stuff
and pay the higher cost, which, spread over the number of pastries involved,
would hardly be onerous. On top of all that, Danish politicians have voted overwhelmingly
for the new rules.
So “Brussels”
is not banning anything, showing that Farage is as honest as the day is long,
providing that day is December 21st. All that is happening is that bakers have
to reduce levels of the more harmful Cassia cinnamon, or use the real thing.
Those lower levels were agreed between member states a full five years ago. Only now, in a slow news period, has the UK
press woken up and taken advantage.
And the only reason for that is to frighten the
readers. No change there, then.
More grist for the EU hatred mill.
ReplyDelete"Greggs forced to rename their Cornish pasties by the EU because they contain peas and carrots"
Read on and you'll find this was at the request of the Cornish Pasty Association. Greggs isn't concerned either.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2530273/Greggs-forced-rename-Cornish-pasties-EU-contain-peas-carrots.html