Once upon a time I would always avoid calling Oxford
graduates stupid, because of the thought that Oxford did not let stupid people
through the door. But former Tory MP Louise Mensch has convinced me otherwise:
here is someone who exhibits all the symptoms of total stupidity, carrying on
her rant against the Guardian even
after she had led her former colleagues to make fools of themselves this week.
Has she got news for us? No - as usual
The appearance before the Home Affairs Select Committee
(HASC) by editor Alan Rusbridger was in most part a farce. Rusbridger, by
any non-partisan judgment, hardly broke sweat: not even that part of the
Fourth Estate that blames him for Murdoch closing the Screws could muster much in the way of criticism. And worse was to
come for Ms Mensch’s proxy Julian Smith.
Smith rocked
up on Channel 4 News, where presenter Jon Snow, and Stateside press
stalwart Carl Bernstein, took him apart, also without expending much energy.
Smith and the Tories on the HASC had become obsessed with following Ms Mensch’s
equally obsessional pursuit of what she called the Guardian’s alleged “trafficking
of agents’ names”.
It turned out that there was only a possibility that some names were present in files which were
transferred from one Guardian office –
in London – to their New York premises. “Trafficking”
means
buying and selling, and infers illegality (she and her former colleagues
also allege “communicating”). There
was no buying and selling, and no information was communicated with a third
party. So that’s a fail, then.
One might think that Ms Mensch would give up after getting
it so wrong, but one would be wrong: even late last night she was trying to
stand up an accusation that Glenn Greenwald had somehow tricked documents out
of the Guardian before tendering his
resignation (no reliable citation was offered). Greenwald already had the cache
from former NSA contractor Edward Snowden.
In the meantime, she has tried one last throw of the dice,
with “Has
Rusbridger exposed thousands of GCHQ personnel?” another of those
rhetorical questions to which the answer is assumed by the author to be “Yes”. Here, readers are told that she is
right because she has selected sources that say what she wants to hear: that “agents” have been “compromised” in their thousands.
Sadly, the comments show that her audience is tiring: of the
19 that are not her, just one offers
support. The rest range between scepticism and ridicule, plus the occasional
suggestion that she has defamed her adversary, to which she replies “I await the denial from the Guardian. None will come, because I am right”.
Yes, they really do let stupid people
into Oxford University.
But Louise Mensch has done one thing right. Leaving politics
– hopefully for good.
Not totally convinced that she is a complete idiot.
ReplyDeleteShe is paid by Murdoch so one presumes she is toeing his line and being handsomely rewarded for that. Not bad for spouting rubbish.
It has been alleged that NOTW were involved with The Met in helping to mess up the Daniel Morgan Murder investigation (see Jacqui Haymes evidence at Leveson). If "other" agencies have been possibly involved in an intelligence "gathering" association could there be a quid pro quo going on?
She has become our Sarah Palin. Giving up office half way through term for the Murdoch Moolah.
ReplyDeleteBoth paid to make ludicrous, attention seeking, and therefore ad revenue earning, statements.