The press, or at least the right-leaning part of it, loves
to kick the hated BBC. But there is also hit-bait to be generated by talking
about the Corporation’s output, and especially shows that appeal across age
ranges. So when Matt Smith decided to bow out as the eleventh incarnation of Dr Who, they were in there
like a shot. And when Peter Capaldi got the gig, they were off and running.
Or at least the Mail
was. The Telegraph was content to
mention that Capaldi had previously featured as Malcolm Tucker in The Thick Of It, and the film spin-off In The Loop, but the Mail had to transform the news into some
kind of full-blown crisis for the Beeb. This meant a level of investigative
journalism not seen since, oh I dunno, the last time they trawled someone’s
Twitter feed.
So, while
Serena Davies says in the Tel that
“Capaldi is not only a skilled comedian,
he is an actor with real gravitas ... He also, crucially, has a US profile”
(all true, and all big plus points), Christopher
Stephens says “After all the hype, Mr
Potty Mouth had better be good ... That shouty, sweary, scary Scotsman from the
political sitcom The Thick Of It
would be taking over as the Time Lord”.
What a generous soul. “We’ve
seen similar before, when JK Rowling’s publishers whipped up a frenzy around
the launch of each Harry Potter book, with midnight queues in bookshops and
crowds of fans in wigs and costumes. It
always leaves a sense of hangover and deflation in the morning. What publishers
and TV execs never remember is that hysteria doesn’t last. Nothing stays at
fever pitch for long”.
See? It’s rubbish already. And
if the show wasn’t the problem, Capaldi’s age certainly was: he is around
the age William Hartnell was when he started the series off in November 1963
(and yes, I was watching, in black and white, and with just the 405 lines of
screen definition). What the Mail
cannot get its head round is that Hartnell was a very good Doctor, and not an
easy act to follow.
That may have been because, like Capaldi, he was an
established actor before taking the role. And any idea that those in their
mid-50s might not be up to the schedule should also remember that, in those
early days, Hartnell, whose health was not good, managed 48 episodes of Dr Who a year for his three year tenure.
Capaldi will not have a problem with the physical side.
Nor will anyone involved in Dr Who have a problem with the ability of industry watchers to bet
on Capaldi as the deadline for his unveiling neared. This, of course, is yet
another angle for the Mail to talk
up, and pretend that it means trouble for the Corporation. But don’t think that
they want the franchise to come to any harm: more of the Doctor means more
cheap hits for Mail Online.
The UK’s best-resourced paper – and it has to stoop so low to generate content.
"That shouty, sweary, scary Scotsman". As opposed to a certain shouty, sweary, scary man DM editor.
ReplyDeleteThe Daily Mail was going to bash the choice whoever it was. If anything, Capaldi's appointment flat-footed them somewhat.
ReplyDeleteIf it had been another hot, young thing, they'd have attacked the BBC for a lack of originality. If they'd gone for a black or a female doctor the DM would have hit the roof (PC gone mad etc).
A white, middle-aged man is pretty much the ideal candidate for the Mail, but, as it's the BBC, they simply have to find an angle to attack them with. As it is, it’s pretty thin gruel, as evidenced by the lacklustre nature of the articles.
Along with that other popular BBC show Top Gear, I suspect that the reason the DM is somewhat negative towards Dr Who is that with overseas sales and merchandising, it probably pays for itself many times over, and is consequently a storming BBC success story.
ReplyDeleteAlong with that other popular BBC show Top Gear, I suspect that the reason the DM is somewhat negative towards Dr Who is that with overseas sales and merchandising, it probably pays for itself many times over, and is consequently a storming BBC success story.
ReplyDelete