It is rare indeed that the Daily Mail’s unfunny and talentless churnalist Richard Littlejohn
is commanded by his legendarily foul mouthed editor to respond to yesterday
morning’s Today programme – after all,
Dick needs his beauty sleep, and he’s five time zones away in Florida – which
makes today’s attack on a guest who inconvenienced Iain Duncan Cough so
unusual.
Rebecca, Guv? She's got a funny accent, innit?!?
In his rant, Littlejohn’s frustrations, prejudices and
victimhood complex come together as he vents his spleen, as ordered by Paul
Dacre, at the hated BBC, and its “relentless
Left-wing propaganda juggernaut”, which means more people trust the Beeb
than the Mail, not that either Dick
or Dacre can get it into their heads that the reason for this might be because
they are so persistently dishonest.
“Meet
the BBC’s poster girl for welfare ‘cuts’” froths the headline.
Littlejohn and his boss are angry that the Corporation has given away so little
information about Rebecca, as they have called her, that they cannot track her
down – and thereby administer the usual hatchet job, to question her
credibility and rubbish her testimony. The frustration in Littlejohn’s
scribbling is clear for all to see.
And he does his best to suggest that Rebecca is not entitled
to claim benefits: “She sounded African
... My guess is that Rebecca was conjured up from central casting
by a researcher with one of the myriad Left-wing ‘anti-cuts’ groups on
speed dial. She was specially selected to
prove that the Tories aren’t just heartless, they’re racist, too”
says the pundit who guesses ethnicity from someone’s voice.
You think I jest? As the man said, there’s more: “when did Rebecca come to Britain? Where, exactly,
did she come from? Is she an asylum seeker, or an economic migrant? On what
grounds was she given the right to settle here? Did she have any children before she came to Britain or were they born
here? London is a big city. Where, precisely, does she live?”
Perhaps Dicky Boy can provide a form for her and the Beeb to
fill in. And then he can explain why he is pushing the narrative that Rebecca
was not born in the UK, and suggesting that she may be one of those asylum
seekers that his paper has been using to frighten readers for decades, all the
while not being in the least racist. He might then explain how the interview “broke every rule of basic journalism”.
Then his editor can explain why he is searching for Rebecca,
with the sole purpose of trashing her reputation, just so he can put one over
on the BBC. Meanwhile, that Duncan Cough was reduced to talking merely in terms
of his “belief” in the efficacy of
his “benefit cap” is not told. That
any of those, by definition, fine and upstanding ministers have not come up to
scratch can never be told to the readers.
Littlejohn has
inadvertently shown just how sick and frightened Paul Dacre really is.
"On what grounds was she given the right to settle here?"
ReplyDeleteOn what grounds was RL given the right to settle in the USA?
I didn't catch Rebecca but I did catch "Rose" - A Civil Servant- whose arguments in favour of the benefit cap were tenuous to say the least.
ReplyDeleteI was appalled by the BBC's coverage.
They claimed the cap would save £110 million as though it were a simple fact.
I was also appalled that IDS was allowed his gibberish unchallenged.
As though people can simply decide to be employed or not.
No mention of the fact that public support for these measures is based on wildly inaccurate assumptions.
But what really saddens me is the lack of a major political party willing to stand up for basic decency.