Yesterday, an Asiana Airlines Boeing 777 crash landed at San
Francisco Airport. Conditions were good, the wind was light, and there had
apparently been no emergency declared. The aircraft was almost full, with
around 290 passengers on board. Yet, despite the aircraft losing its tail and
the subsequent fire, there were just two fatalities and the hull emerged
largely intact.
The Asiana Boeing 777 involved in the incident
This, it does not have to be said, is not enough for the
shock horror merchants of the Fourth Estate. The coverage has to dwell on the
landing gear being torn off – hardly a big deal in the scheme of things – and one
of the two engines coming away from its mountings (ditto), along with talking
of “blazes” and an “inferno” rather than the obvious
covering of fire retardant foam from an alert airport fire service.
Yes, the airport’s firefighters and other emergency response
teams did what they train over and over again to do: turned up at the scene,
damped down any fire, assisted in the evacuation, got the injured treated and
to the nearest medical facility, provided reassurance, and then preserved the
scene for the sound people of the NTSB to take over the business of
investigating what happened.
So, while the BBC calmly relates “Boeing 777 plane crash-lands at San Francisco airport”, and points
out that this is the first time that passengers have been killed in an incident
involving a 777, which has been in service around 18 years (Boeing has
delivered over a thousand of them. They have flown tens of millions of miles),
the tabloids cannot let it go without talking it up a bit.
Thus the Mail
tells of “Horror
... fireball ... horrifying pictures [all of which they have published]”
and only later on mentions that 190 of those aboard walked away after using the
emergency evacuation slides. But at least that account confirms that all on
board have been accounted for. Over at the Super Soaraway Currant Bun, that
minor fact had not been updated when I last looked a few minutes ago.
Rupe’s downmarket troops scream “Two
die in crash-land jet inferno ... plane terror as tail snaps off”,
while managing not to mention that the pressurised tube that forms the
passenger compartment was largely intact. Instead, readers are told that there
are “another 60 unaccounted for”. So
it’s the usual standard of responsible journalism, then.
What we do know is that the investigators will do their
work, the cause of the incident will be made clear, and if any actions need to
be taken as a result, then they will be taken, no ifs, no buts. That is why
flying has become far safer over the recent past, with more miles being flown,
yet fewer injuries and fatalities. That needs to be taken on board, and yes, even by the press.
If you’re getting on a plane today, folks, remember one
thing: don’t worry about it.
"Fewer injuries", Tim, not "less injuries".
ReplyDeleteYou got it ;-)
ReplyDelete