This blog routinely gives the perpetually thirsty Paul
Staines and his rabble at the Guido Fawkes blog stick. The Fawkes folks,
generally, richly deserve it. But on one matter, I agree with Staines, and that
is the clumsy defamation of him by the technologically illiterate Tory MP Claire
Perry, who represents the unfortunate people of the fine town of Devizes (home
of Wadworth’s legendary 6X ale).
Claire Perry (at present still an MP)
The narrative is straightforward (and can be seen in this post from Unity at Ministry of Truth): Ms Perry’s site was hacked, and, as befits the hacking of an anti-porn campaigner, a number of images definitely NSFW were left there. The Fawkes blog posted about the hacking, and included a screen shot – nothing else. “Porn campaigner gets hacked and porn left” cannot be other than newsworthy.
At this point, Ms Perry appears to have gone completely
gaga, indulging in a Twitter rant where she accuses Staines of “hosting a
link that distributed porn via my website” (potentially actionable),
followed by talking of “the hacking
of my website sponsored by @guidofawkes”, which is definitely actionable, unless she can show that Staines encouraged
the hackers (unlikely).
Now, this blog has noted that The Great Guido has in the
past threatened to set m’Learned friends on his critics on what look like shaky
pretexts – the incident outside London Bridge tube station, where a camerawoman
was knocked over, comes to mind – but this is straightforward and clear
defamation, and moreover, Staines has given her ample opportunity to withdraw.
So now the stage has been reached where Staines’
lawyers have been instructed – The Great Guido might also consider looking
to Adrian Hilton aka Archbishop Cranmer,
who has
repeated the “sponsored” accusation
– and it can only end in tears for Ms Perry. Not only is she more than likely
to lose any subsequent action, but will also be exposed as a clueless
technophobe.
And that’s going to be difficult for the press’ anti-porn
campaign, which, as Unity points
out in his post today, has been, shall we say, subject to Ms Perry’s input.
As Paul Bernal has
pointed out at the Staggers, the
proposals unveiled the other day by Young Dave raise more questions than they
answer, and are deeply unconvincing as a result. The Perry sideshow could seriously
damage Cameron’s idea.
The best course of action for Claire Perry is to hold her
hands up, say sorry, and pay whatever multiple of The Two Dollars is necessary
to settle the legal bills. Then she has to hope that the news cycle will move
on, and spare her further embarrassment. Because the more attention that is
focused on her lack of technical savvy, the more it will damage her reputation
and that of the anti-porn campaign.
On this occasion, it is not The Great Guido who is in another fine mess.
Her antiporn campaign is just a Daily Mail sponsored piece of shit legislation being rolled out to appease the Mumsnet brigade next election. It deserves to die a slow death, and surely will as soon as the government realise it's not actually feasible or practical to implement.
ReplyDeleteObviously ridiculous to blame Staines. The Dilbert strip 'pointy headed boss' was based on Staines knowledge of technology.
ReplyDeleteInteresting how the Daily Mail have chosen to completely ignore the story.
ReplyDeleteWhy is this Perry idiot an MP. My 12 year old daughter is more tech savvy ( she set up the homes porn blockers that stop my 16 year old son watch teh pornos :D ).
ReplyDeleteYoung Dave should fire Perry and hire my daughter for his internets adviser.