No sooner were the punditerati poring over Education
Secretary Michael “Oiky” Gove’s
remarks yesterday on The Andy Marr Show (tm) than he got rumbled for being highly
selective with the actualité. Gove has
been using a variety of allegedly authoritative statistics, and quoting current
academic practice, to justify his wonderful new version of various curricula.
If it oiks like an oik ...
Sadly, his
statistics were, in the main, of
the highly dubious variety: two of the polls he has been quoting have been
revealed to be PR puff exercises commissioned by UKTV Gold and Premier Inns.
Another was commissioned by the Sea Cadets to mark the anniversary of the
Battle of Trafalgar. A fourth was taken from an article in London Mums magazine.
And he had not used
the original data from the Sea Cadets poll, but quoted from a magazine article.
This emerged when retired
teacher Janet Downs smelt a rat after reading the assertion “Survey after survey has revealed disturbing
historical ignorance, with one teenager in five believing Winston Churchill was
a fictional character while 58% think Sherlock Holmes was real”.
Ms Downs put in a Freedom of Information (FoI) request to
Gove’s department (that’s the kind of thing the so-called Taxpayers’ Alliance
do, only not when it’s one of their political soulmates like “Oiky”). There was the customary
foot-dragging, but eventually the information was reluctantly divulged. The
survey behind the remark was not only from UKTV Gold, but was also five years out of date.
It got worse: Gove’s now
talked of someone using Mr Men characters to illustrate the rise to power
of the Third Reich. “As long as there are
people in education making excuses for failure, cursing future generations with
a culture of low expectations, denying children access to the best that has
been thought and written, because Nemo and the Mr Men are more relevant, the
battle needs to be joined” he chirped.
Russel Tarr, the teacher concerned, responded “I do not teach the Third Reich ... The
actual topic in question is the Weimar Republic 1918-33 ... The process of
transforming a sophisticated historical phenomenon to its essential elements in
a manner that much younger students will understand [Mr Men characters] is no easy feat: it requires a sustained
handling of analogy and metaphor”.
He concluded “Gove and
his advisers – either through stupidity or mischievousness – failed to place
me, my website, or the lesson into its appropriate context. His criticisms
betray a lack of knowledge, understanding, and interpretation that would make a
GCSE history student blush with shame”. He sounds almost surprised. But
this sort of journalistic “twist and
shaft” is happening far too often.
Mr Gove ought to stick
to his Mr Job and desist from being Mr Stirring Hack.
I'm sure the great British Media will hold power to account when they all report on this in their next editions!
ReplyDeletehttp://paulbernal.wordpress.com/2013/05/09/mr-gove/
ReplyDelete