Another day brings another opportunity for the perpetually
thirsty Paul Staines and his rabble at the Guido Fawkes blog to parade their
ignorance before a grateful readership. Today’s masterfully executed
foot-in-mouth moment comes as the Fawkes folks discover some figures on the
cost of Tax Credits, and as a result draw a conclusion rather different to
reality.
"Evidence Based Blogging"? Yeah, right
“How
Tax Credits Are Set to Rocket” is the headline, and at the outset the
standard of routine misinformation is clear, with a graph presented which, not
for the first time with the Fawkes blog, cuts off the Y-Axis well short of
zero. This makes the rise in Tax Credits look far greater than it really is.
And that the first year for which figures are shown is 2008-9 does also not
appear to tell them anything.
At this point, it may prove instructive to mention that, according
to HMRC, Tax Credits are paid to those without children if their annual
income is below approximately £13,000 for a single person and £18,000 for a
couple (Child Tax Credits are given in addition). So those in receipt are
always going to be the least well off in society.
Now consider the start date for that graph: 2008 was
when the global financial crisis hit, and the UK’s recession began. Hence
the amounts of Tax Credits being paid going up, as this shows there are more
people out there on lower incomes. As the recession has bottomed out, so the
amounts of Tax Credits paid have more or less stabilised. This, too, is not too
hard to understand.
That the numbers are predicted to get worse from 2014-5
means, therefore, that either the Tax Credit regime is becoming more generous
(doubtful), or that there will be more people on low earnings. This suggests
that economic growth in the UK will be weak, as will overall economic
conditions. It is these factors that are behind the 35% projected rise in Tax
Credits over nine years.
To no surprise at all, the Fawkes rabble has drawn the
entirely opposite conclusion, signing off “Austerity,
what austerity?” when it should be clear to anyone paying attention that
the graph they have just presented demonstrates not only the onset of that same
austerity, but that it will continue for several more years to come, except
perhaps in the world of The Great Guido.
This is, after all, a land inhabited by well-funded lobby
groups and their hangers-on, along with the full range of overmonied hacks and
pundits, those representatives of the MSM that was previously hated but to
which Staines and his pals have now so shamelessly sold out. The less well off are
something they do not have to consider: after all, they can always find a chap
to do that sort of thing for them.
It’s just a pity they can’t be bothered to get their facts
right. Another fine mess.
Actually, I'm not even sure this counts as a rise. Difficult to scrutinise figures when the source isn't properly specified, but a rise from £30bn in 2013-14 to £32.5bn in 2017-2018 is a rise of just over 8%, which works out at 2% over 4 years. As it's unlikely we'll be getting inflation under 2% any time soon, that to me looks like a slight real-terms cut. (And I can't see anything on the graph to indicate the figures are inflation-adjusted.)
ReplyDeleteWhether that is justified or necessary is open for debate, but it's not what I'd call "rocketing".